Snake said:regardless of who comes or goes, it's flat out wrong to drag all this ... through the media...it's not fair on the fans.
Seems like every time we are going great and winning comps, we the fans never get to enjoy it.
Snake said:regardless of who comes or goes, it's flat out wrong to drag all this ... through the media...it's not fair on the fans.
Ramrod said:RiverEagle said:Oh @globaleagle
Told you I didn't want to dive into these threads! (Once you're in, very hard to swim out).
However @Ramrod a good business-model incorporates human resource management. Including compassionate grounds for employees.
Just as every player's contract is unique, so too should be their exit plan, or potential exit plan.
To think that if Skivy, for example, being released a year early to take up a 4mill-deal, would see mass exodus is alarmist and naive.
And you Ramrod were the one saying last week that Matai wasn't all that valuable (,to Manly) and should get to 200 games before throwing his market-value weight around, where you not?
Now he's invaluable and pivotal to Manly's business and ethical profile. Or just to suit your argument this week, more precisely.
His age and our plans beyond 2015 would not see us offering him millions for 3 years. If that sort of offer is available to him now, when it may not be after next year (if he stays) we should consider letting him go home, on compassionate grounds.
That enhances both our business-profile and moral or ethical blueprint too.
And whether he leaves soon or in a year, he will leave, or retire (just like Beaver for example). And then we have to replace him like we do with every aging player.
Oh, and what you, I or the Prime Minister earns is irrelevant. Sporting stars are paid relative to what their industry or field can pay; same as every occupation or profession.
And again, the bottom line for me is Skivy has earned the right to be at least heard out on this release-issue.
He is a legend. (We told Beaver no, not one more year. We didn't even offer Gift another year either). This time it's Skivy saying no, not one more year please , from his side of the table.
And don't forget the money we'd save can go on other, younger players; even towards re-signing Chez if they choose.
I would NEVER say Matai is "invaluable".
It would contradict why I would want Manly to keep him.
Skivy is awesome and I would want him to stay.
Somehow, you're very keen to get rid of Skivy so that younger or other players can be signed.
I still disagree with you.
Ex-Manly players that have left and went for more money elsewhere only to regret it and went on the media to say that they wished they had stayed (eg. Shearer, Ridge, etc.).
I'm ONLY doing Matai a favour by telling him he should stay. He will only regret it.
This is my long term version of Human Resource management and player welfare. I don't want him to look back with regrets and end up with depression for wearing another jersey.
You are wrong again. 🙂
Bradza said:I'd like to hear from the players speaking up about exactly how they would have divvied up the current salary cap and retained a competitive 25 man squad for 2015 (including Gift). They'd probably say 'that's not our job' and I'd say exactly, so shut up and play footy.
RiverEagle said:Ramrod said:RiverEagle said:Oh @globaleagle
Told you I didn't want to dive into these threads! (Once you're in, very hard to swim out).
However @Ramrod a good business-model incorporates human resource management. Including compassionate grounds for employees.
Just as every player's contract is unique, so too should be their exit plan, or potential exit plan.
To think that if Skivy, for example, being released a year early to take up a 4mill-deal, would see mass exodus is alarmist and naive.
And you Ramrod were the one saying last week that Matai wasn't all that valuable (,to Manly) and should get to 200 games before throwing his market-value weight around, where you not?
Now he's invaluable and pivotal to Manly's business and ethical profile. Or just to suit your argument this week, more precisely.
His age and our plans beyond 2015 would not see us offering him millions for 3 years. If that sort of offer is available to him now, when it may not be after next year (if he stays) we should consider letting him go home, on compassionate grounds.
That enhances both our business-profile and moral or ethical blueprint too.
And whether he leaves soon or in a year, he will leave, or retire (just like Beaver for example). And then we have to replace him like we do with every aging player.
Oh, and what you, I or the Prime Minister earns is irrelevant. Sporting stars are paid relative to what their industry or field can pay; same as every occupation or profession.
And again, the bottom line for me is Skivy has earned the right to be at least heard out on this release-issue.
He is a legend. (We told Beaver no, not one more year. We didn't even offer Gift another year either). This time it's Skivy saying no, not one more year please , from his side of the table.
And don't forget the money we'd save can go on other, younger players; even towards re-signing Chez if they choose.
I would NEVER say Matai is "invaluable".
It would contradict why I would want Manly to keep him.
Skivy is awesome and I would want him to stay.
Somehow, you're very keen to get rid of Skivy so that younger or other players can be signed.
I still disagree with you.
Ex-Manly players that have left and went for more money elsewhere only to regret it and went on the media to say that they wished they had stayed (eg. Shearer, Ridge, etc.).
I'm ONLY doing Matai a favour by telling him he should stay. He will only regret it.
This is my long term version of Human Resource management and player welfare. I don't want him to look back with regrets and end up with depression for wearing another jersey.
You are wrong again. 🙂
Oh that's just plain cheeky mate...lol.
I'm not necessarily wrong...We agree to disagree, remember?
I don't want to get rid of Skivy at all.
I'd love him to play forever (at Manly).
It's just not reality.
And IF that Warriors offer is accurate (3-4 million) I'm simply saying I would let him go home to NZ, and bank 3 or 4 times what we can offer (if we offer anything at all by next season's end ).
In fact, the debacle with Gift this year could be repeated next year with Skivy, if indeed we force him to stay.
And any massive deal (specifically from the Warriors) may not be there then, and Skivy could be left with little or nothing. Or most likely have to go to the UK for a decent last deal.
It's well known how close he is to his family back in NZ. It's stubborn and disrespectful to not factor all that (plus his service to Manly) and at least consider the request.
However, as pointed out, the NRL and/or Manly of course, may well insist the contract is unbreakable for 2015.
And I'd STILL bet Skivy would play his ar$e off for Manly as always.
Ramrod said:I hope it all works out well for Manly.
I feared all this would happen after what Gifty went through.
Very sad.
HappilyManly said:http://www.foxsports.com.au/video?vc=222
The Manly Half Hour on Fox 😛
Yes, that has to top this week's conspiracy theories list 😀niccipops said:Watched some of these Manly stories. I have to say that the one on Matai's heart not being with Manly due to him sitting down halfway through the team song, Monday night, was borderline hilarious.
He had injured his leg during that game.
Ex doggie Steve Turner says it's a definite sign that his heart's no longer with Manly.
Not saying there aren't any rumblings going on at our club but some journalism is just plain ridiculous.🙄
The Eagle Has Landed said:On channel 9 news Mutiny at Manly
lsz said:As an aside is this thread now the biggest in ST history?
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |