eagle-rock08 link said:Interesting that the articles were written by women! Is that assumption correct?
I am also reminded of the saying those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. I wonder if any of these writers were ever drunk in their lives?
I remember a recent article where Stewart was exonerated but they still referred to the 'boozy lunch' season opener.
Also, wasn't Stewart proven to 'not be under the influence of alcohol' at the court? So does that now make David Gallop's original decision incorrect?
It seems to be a pity that David Gallop didn't 'pace the floor' a little longer and come up with a more favourable decision.
Wilson has been done twice for DUI, of course it doesn't stop her outrage that someone else would get drunk and do something stupid, even if she hasn't got a clue what happened.