He came into the Tigers system as a ball playing lock, but mostly played second row and five eight. I'm not sure how many games he has played for us at lock. Clearly he can cover that spot. Can he play any quality time for us in the prop rotation over the next few weeks? Because that's what we are going to need. Losing Keppie for three weeks at this stage of the season is far from ideal. Completely understandable though. But he needs to be replaced and Sironens experience could come in handy off the bench in the next few rounds. Particularly against the Storm and the Eels.Siro has played lock for us before I'm sure. It was a couple of years back now
Walker actually provides a lot of value off the bench. He's only had like one bad game since coming back from injury and that was playing at 6 against raiders which he shouldn't have in the first place. But he's actually been a quality 14, can't take it away from him. Brings a spark in attack, a lot to work on with his defence but expected when he is defending in the middle for the first time in his career. He will improve. And once he comes on Jake shifts to the prop rotation, so carrying just one prop in Sipley on the bench works out for us. Lawton is obvious the other bench spot and I wouldn't mind Siro as the last man on the bench. Ease him and try play him as a lock in the last 15-20 mins. But once Aloiai is back from suspension I would slot him in place of Siro.Can Sironen be repurposed as a middle forward? (Assuming he is fit to play of course) Looking at our current situation with Keppie being unavailable for three weeks, could Sironen step in as a middle forward and cover for Jake? If so perhaps Lawton could take Walkers utility position at 14, provide cover for the centres, halves, lock and second rows? These are all questions. I am not advocating for this to occur BUT I think a bench of Lawton, Sironen, De Luis, Sipley looks stronger then Walker, Lawton, De Luis, Sipley.
I agree totally. I would be very upset with the club if they didn't give him a second season.I'd be very disappointed. The man is all heart, soul.and character.
Depends who takes his spot.I agree totally. I would be very upset with the club if they didn't give him a second season.
Really thought those early games in a Manly side going very ordinary, Davey was a standout and played with plenty of intensity in that short time he made the paddock....could tell he was really ripping in to show he was worthy of the opportunity Manly gave him.I thought Davey was contracted for next year. If so why would we let him go?
He's a bargain basement depth forward who was showing great signs before his injury, and also a 'grown-up' to keep the squad culture realistic.
I might have to rephrase my post. Can Sironen be repurposed as an effective middle forward, with the ability/motor to play both at prop and lock if required?
Especially the modern game, he could really thrive there.Been advocating trialling him as a prop since the rise and rise of Guacamole and Schuster on the edges ... he is big enough, a good defender and very mobile with skills .. the upside if successful would be big.
Especially the modern game, he could really thrive there.
Can offload but seldom doesI think that would be his best position now - big, strong, runs hard, can offload & has a good work rate. His father also played prop at the backend of his career.
wow that is poor. 12.6 games a season including finals... missing more than half the season every year for 10 years. ship himTen years for 126 games.
From the little I saw of Davey before his injury I'd be very disappointed if the club released him, he plays with heart and doesn't mind getting his hands dirty, there's others I'd move on before himIF Davey is actually let go as has been suggested on here then I would offer Siro a contract on a largely reduced contract. I still haven't heard any more about Davey leaving other than some random guy on Twitter though.
5 years and 60 games for each.wow that is poor. 12.6 games a season including finals... missing more than half the season every year for 10 years. ship him
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |