So, is there a game this weekend or are we ****ed and being kicked out?
It's just click bait, let's concentrate on the Panfers!!
It's just click bait, let's concentrate on the Panfers!!
You should have wrote "She was like" she is nowhere near the journo she once was, SMH is also struggling to find a buyer so this will help circulation. Its a beat up and will fizzle.She's like Martin Blank in the movie Grosse Pointe Blank where he says"if I show up at your door,chances are you did something to bring me there
Who are you referring to? I'm not a rocket scientist.
How would the police know what constitutes salary cap breach ?, unless they can prove that it was a club official that handed over bags of cash in an official capacity, then they're just pi$$ing the wind.From reading this thread I can gather:
1) we are not guilty of match fixing.
2) the NRL isn't in possession of anything relating Manly to salary cap breaches
3) an ex player may have been given a $4.5k cash payment in a car park?
4) the police may have evidence of salary cap breaches - but they may or may not be able to pass onto the NRL due to legal reasons.
Am I missing something?
Now that that has been put to bed it may just happen. The difference the was the NrL stated they were following the enquiries. Now the nrl said they know nothing of it which kind of flies in the face of statements that there is an nrlRemembering the 'match fixing scandal' and seeing the clubs emblem over the front page with their stupid, and I thought liable headlines, I would have thought the club would have sued them then.
I certainly hope it's still on the agenda because I'm sure there's more defamatory headlines on the way.
Fun fact, the CEO of my company is in fact a rocket scientist, which gets the obligatory joke at every meetingAre you a rocket surgeon?
Better a boat?
Except that they were fined for breaching the cap for many years in a row and CEO Brian Waldron was under massive pressure from News Limited to make sure it didn't happen again. When the pressure was mounting from players who had only extended their contracts thanks to TPAs from "TBC" and TBC had not yet been found, Waldron was forced to get a bit more creative to make sure they weren't fined again. Once they got going they couldn't help themselves and it just increased year after year until they got busted.Storm never had any problems with the cap either,until they were caught.
Yeah, must be a coincidence.Is it just a coincidence that this story breaks the day that the Eels ex CEO admits in court that he was forced by board members to approve cash payments outside the cap to players? Instead of questions around who forced him to make the payments or which players and managers accepted the illegal payments and were the payments declared for tax purposes they come up with a story around a rumour about a possible illegal payment years ago to an unnamed ex Manly player.
Hmm, two coincidences at the same time, now that would be a big coincidence!Its no co-incidence that the police are today saying there is no match fixing issues and this comes out. By writing this garbage they are attempting to bury the real story that they got it wrong
2 coincidences make a rumour.Yeah, must be a coincidence.
Hmm, two coincidences at the same time, now that would be a big coincidence!
5) 8 other un named Clubs may be in Salary Cap breachesFrom reading this thread I can gather:
1) we are not guilty of match fixing.
2) the NRL isn't in possession of anything relating Manly to salary cap breaches
3) an ex player may have been given a $4.5k cash payment in a car park?
4) the police may have evidence of salary cap breaches - but they may or may not be able to pass onto the NRL due to legal reasons.
Am I missing something?
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |