Salary Cap Witch Hunt. **Appeal unsuccessful**

Manly Sea Eagles have told the NRL they will lodge an appeal over the salary cap sanctions handed down to the club on Monday.

Sea Eagles chairman Scott Penn confirmed to NRL.com the club had alerted the NRL Appeals Committee of its intention to protest the $750,000 fine and the $660,000 in salary cap restrictions.

I hope we rip them a new one! Go Manly!
 
Manly Sea Eagles have told the NRL they will lodge an appeal over the salary cap sanctions handed down to the club on Monday.

Sea Eagles chairman Scott Penn confirmed to NRL.com the club had alerted the NRL Appeals Committee of its intention to protest the $750,000 fine and the $660,000 in salary cap restrictions.

I hope we rip them a new one! Go Manly!

I know accuracy is too much to hope for with the modern hack journo .... but are we appealing the judgement or just the penalty .... big difference.
 
Manly will challenge the NRL's salary cap penalty.

Sea Eagles chairman Scott Penn told AAP that the club had lodged paperwork to take their case to the NRL appeals committee.

The Sea Eagles were this week fined $750,000 and slugged $660,000 in salary cap penalties over the next two years after being sanctioned by the governing body however have maintained their innocence.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/manly-to-fight-nrl-s-salary-cap-penalty
 
Who is on the NRL's committee anyway ? Are they independent or just another Greenturd appointed arm of the NRL ???

Can't see us getting a subjective & fair hearing !!
Probably more a necessary step before taking it to court. I don’t think Manly expect the NRL to change their decision - regardless of whether it was right or wrong.
 
it will certainly put a different complexion on things if it does eventually go to a common law matter . Fighting the good fight for sure if it does get to that stage and if the recommendation is that Manly has a strong case.
 
NRL appeals committee is as follows:
Todd Greenflog
Nick Weaks
James Hooper
The Mole
Reading TP
Make it 800 k and one more page then for them to deliberate on and review.That will stump them .[ and of course exclusive rights recognition to H M on the initial paper estimate ]
 
Peter....doesnt he have to actually play ? Somewhere. ..blacktown even...in order to get paid ? Medical retirement I get...either insurance or club pays...may or may not count in in your cap etc ( dependant upon if you play for the eels etc )...but just straight out retirement ? I dont recall this ever happening with any player at any club ...pls explain...anyone..? Or give me an instance where its happened.
Yes he does have to play as he wasn't medically retired, however I would say the club probably came to some settlement that was mutually beneficial to both parties, ie he stays away and we probably pay him half his contract, or he comes back and has to play for our feeder club, better to piss him off.
 
Yes he does have to play as he wasn't medically retired, however I would say the club probably came to some settlement that was mutually beneficial to both parties, ie he stays away and we probably pay him half his contract, or he comes back and has to play for our feeder club, better to piss him off.
Yet he apparently does not have to be included in the main 30 man squad . Certainly pretty flexible guidelines .
 
Yet he apparently does not have to be included in the main 30 man squad . Certainly pretty flexible guidelines .
The powers that be have really made the whole game extremely difficult to understand both on and off the field. Outside shoulder, inside shoulder. TPAs. Conditions for medical retirement. Paying players at other clubs.
And they wonder why interest in the game is plummeting.
 
Yes he does have to play as he wasn't medically retired, however I would say the club probably came to some settlement that was mutually beneficial to both parties, ie he stays away and we probably pay him half his contract, or he comes back and has to play for our feeder club, better to piss him off.

It was a joke that we signed him in the first place, whoever authorised that needs sacking!!
 
The powers that be have really made the whole game extremely difficult to understand both on and off the field. Outside shoulder, inside shoulder. TPAs. Conditions for medical retirement. Paying players at other clubs.
And they wonder why interest in the game is plummeting.
And that is probably one of the main reasons why there is then so much inconsistency and double standards in the game now and then with Interpretation on interpretations . Can get a bit annoying but just supporting the mighty Sea Eagles through thick and thin and year in , year out is always still my main interest and priority sporting wise .
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

  • Jethro
    Star Trekkin' across the universe

Members online

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 21 17 0 4 168 40
2 Storm 21 16 0 5 252 38
3 Bulldogs 21 15 0 6 120 36
4 Warriors 21 13 0 8 12 32
5 Panthers 21 12 1 8 115 31
6 Broncos 21 12 0 9 114 30
7 Sharks 22 13 0 9 67 30
8 Roosters 21 11 0 10 92 28
9 Dolphins 21 10 0 11 109 26
10 Sea Eagles 21 9 0 12 -24 24
11 Tigers 21 9 0 12 -107 24
12 Dragons 21 8 0 13 -54 22
13 Cowboys 22 8 1 13 -144 21
14 Eels 21 7 0 14 -156 20
15 Rabbitohs 22 8 0 14 -191 20
16 Knights 21 6 0 15 -186 18
17 Titans 21 5 0 16 -187 16
Back
Top Bottom