Roger_Ramjet said:That's a beautiful thing...You all hate teams other than my chookies. i firstly hate souths and the crowe factor, then I hate the dogs, then I hate any super league teams,,,then Saints and then...Who ever is the dirtiest...
mickqld said:CAN SOMEONE ANSWER ME HOW THE F..K WE LOST TO THIS S..T DOGS TEAM???????
mickqld said:CAN SOMEONE ANSWER ME HOW THE F..K WE LOST TO THIS S..T DOGS TEAM???????
Roger_Ramjet said:Hodkinson would never have seen first grade had he stayed at Manly. He's average, at best.
Mark from Brisbane said:mickqld said:CAN SOMEONE ANSWER ME HOW THE F..K WE LOST TO THIS S..T DOGS TEAM???????
Mick, clearly you are on your 9th XXXX???
Or is it 10th
Roger_Ramjet said:Another stupid rule about how a ball boy deals with a ball out of play.
we will be in for a game next week,in fact the next 4 games will really test us for suremickqld said:Roger_Ramjet said:Another stupid rule about how a ball boy deals with a ball out of play.
It's an idiotic rule introduced by idiots. In saying that Parra were robbed tonight because of it. They should be blowing up deluxe.
RiverEagle said:That'll do me.
The 40/20 stuff up...
Not to be for Parra but that was farcial.
And on that, neither of 'em will trouble the heavy-weights in the semis.
master blaster said:we will be in for a game next week,in fact the next 4 games will really test us for suremickqld said:Roger_Ramjet said:Another stupid rule about how a ball boy deals with a ball out of play.
It's an idiotic rule introduced by idiots. In saying that Parra were robbed tonight because of it. They should be blowing up deluxe.
you always put me at ease RE,lol,thanks buddyRiverEagle said:master blaster said:we will be in for a game next week,in fact the next 4 games will really test us for suremickqld said:Roger_Ramjet said:Another stupid rule about how a ball boy deals with a ball out of play.
It's an idiotic rule introduced by idiots. In saying that Parra were robbed tonight because of it. They should be blowing up deluxe.
From what I saw tonight MB, Manly at 3/4's of our best would beat em both mate.
It seemed a better game because the scores remained close.
Souths as well would've steam-rolled them too.
Roger_Ramjet said:RiverEagle said:That'll do me.
The 40/20 stuff up...
Not to be for Parra but that was farcial.
And on that, neither of 'em will trouble the heavy-weights in the semis.
A farce alright! I always thought AFL had some dumb rules like the one that if a players kicks the ball through the main goal posts and it grazes the posts slightly, it's only a point or if it hits the posts and bounces back into the field, it's a point and they don't play on...This 40/20 ball boy rule is just as dumb as that. I don't see the point of coming up with this rule. Who the hell comes up with this?
RiverEagle said:No worries mate @"master blaster"
You watch Manly step things up the next few weeks!
And @Roger_Ramjet
Mebbe even your Chooks would've won tonight!
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -8 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -22 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -30 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -36 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -38 | 0 |