Is Large eligible to play 1st grade this year?
He is large enough 🤷‍♂️
Is Large eligible to play 1st grade this year?
I’m expecting something Big from Large in 2025.He is large enough 🤷‍♂️
I’ve hear it’s not the size of the wave, it’s the motion of the ocean.Size isn't everything. An ex girlfriend told me that once.
Nothing official, but a poster in the Juniors Discussion thread, @smithy, said Ashton Large was playing hooker for us in the Matts trial vs the Bunnies: Juniors Discussion ThreadHave we worked out whether Ashton Large has come over to Manly as well?
Thanks @Ron E. GibbsNothing official, but a poster in the Juniors Discussion thread, @smithy, said Ashton Large was playing hooker for us in the Matts trial vs the Bunnies: Juniors Discussion Thread
Whoever he was he played well.Nothing official, but a poster in the Juniors Discussion thread, @smithy, said Ashton Large was playing hooker for us in the Matts trial vs the Bunnies: Juniors Discussion Thread
That was definitely Ashton playing for us at hooker. I was watching his game closely and he is going to be an absolute gun.Harold Matt's number 6 in second half..blonde kid...Came on and killed them.. set up a couple of tries and looked very confident.. dare I say his set up for the last try in and away then set up his winger.. he reminded me of the great Bozo
Also hooker who played more than half the game was very very good .. not sure but looked like Ashton Large???
Few others also showed promise
Yes, a work colleague has a boy in the Souths team who knows Ashton and said it wasn't definitely Ashton playing for us.Nothing official, but a poster in the Juniors Discussion thread, @smithy, said Ashton Large was playing hooker for us in the Matts trial vs the Bunnies: Juniors Discussion Thread
The bunnies smashed usYes, a work colleague has a boy in the Souths team who knows Ashton and said it wasn't definitely Ashton playing for us.
Do you mean was?Yes, a work colleague has a boy in the Souths team who knows Ashton and said it wasn't definitely Ashton playing for us.
They did in the Ball,we beat them convincingly in the MattsThe bunnies smashed us
Oh yes sorry, I saw the Ball only - our defence was pretty crook through the middle and the ref certainly didn't give us the same leeway he gave the bunnies - they didn't need the assistance.They did in the Ball,we beat them convincingly in the Matts
Hope he meant wasDo you mean was?
Apologies. Yes WAS definitely Ashton LargeDo you mean was?
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |