Simonmyers11
First Grader
Good point. We look good when we get away a few offloads, and forwards play out the backAs I said Simon, metres can come as a result of 2nd Phase play. Defense however is still needed.
Good point. We look good when we get away a few offloads, and forwards play out the backAs I said Simon, metres can come as a result of 2nd Phase play. Defense however is still needed.
Melbourne play smarter to make up for deficiencies in other areas and Manly have had to do so especially from 2013 onwards to remain competitive.I don't with we have the players to constantly punch holes up the middle. We can though always work on defence and line speed and hopefully the better our D the other areas can be built on the back of that. If we don't have the players to continually rack up 150-200m, we can be smarter with the ball, with variations with short balls and lateral passing and offloads/second phase play when warranted and the opportunity presents itself.
Roosters will be a very good test as we our down 2 key forwards and roosters pack is still very good.
I have no idea what is available in the other grades but always thought we are still lacking in the forward department from what was the expected first grade lineup. (during posts made about the line up from last years threads)
There is an improvement over last year lets take that as a positive which needs to be added to.
I would be letting go a fair few forwards back and front row as they don't fit the right physical build to sustain a constant physical presence.
It's obvious we don't have the cattle to punch through the middle all day so we have to extract as much as we can from our pack, i still think there is room for improvement in this area but nowhere near enough to be a force.I don't with we have the players to constantly punch holes up the middle. We can though always work on defence and line speed and hopefully the better our D the other areas can be built on the back of that. If we don't have the players to continually rack up 150-200m, we can be smarter with the ball, with variations with short balls and lateral passing and offloads/second phase play when warranted and the opportunity presents itself.
Roosters will be a very good test as we our down 2 key forwards and roosters pack is still very good.
Not a fan of TamouI think Manly recognize this and is why we will be looking at players like klemmer, tamou, that big bopper from Melbourne etc. Still one gun Front rower and middle forward/back rower to be real genuine contenders. Im glad we signed Marty, think he is a real weapon
They have one of the top 3 props in the world in brommwich, two NZ rep back rowers, the best hooker in the game and a very underrated pack. They all do a good job and are very good defensively.Melbourne play smarter to make up for deficiencies in other areas and Manly have had to do so especially from 2013 onwards to remain competitive.
I am talking in terms of Melbs history, they have never been an overly forward dominant physical presence but play smarter than most.They have one of the top 3 props in the world in brommwich, two NZ rep back rowers, the best hooker in the game and a very underrated pack. They all do a good job and are very good defensively.
I have no idea .
What?? He regularly runs for 150-200m and is very fit, good D, and gets a very quick play the ball while carrying 3 defenders. Last week ran for 240m, 39 tackles and 1 clean line break. I would have him any day of the week. Watch tonights game and let me know what you think, I bet he has another crackerNot a fan of Tamou
Very well coachedI am talking in terms of Melbs history, they have never been an overly forward dominant physical presence but play smarter than most.
Good point. We look good when we get away a few offloads, and forwards play out the back
"Fluffy" people tend to struggle in most areas of life so i'm glad i am broadening my appeal to a demographic that usually ignores or can't comprehend me.First post you have made sense on ever
Lets not get overly attached to "size" yes we need it(sometimes there is no substitute for size) but it is the style of player also.Still not as good as a monster pack, filled with mongrel and skillful. But you have to play what your got, and I think the absorbtion defense and 2nd phase attack will be our go. Done well it will win games.
Very well coached
"Fluffy" people tend to struggle in most areas of life.
Origin is not about being a great coach but a Motivator and bonding in a short time.Didn't coach NSW very all did he?
Let's see how he goes sans Smith/Cronk.
I'm sure there are exceptions to the rule but life is too short wasting time finding them.Now that's a broad statement!!
That can be ok out of dummy half late in the game, we do it well, but doesn't compare to a harden prop putting his hand up to make the hard runs 5 m out from their own line, or mixing it with the opposition's biggest forwards, putting their body on the line in defence in the middle, or attracting 2-3 defenders while still getting a ball away, putting the opposition on the back foot with a 20m run up the guts, getting that quick play the ball so the half back has room to run to the line. If we had that, DCE and a running walker would have a field dayLets not get overly attached to "size" yes we need it(sometimes there is no substitute for size) but it is the style of player also.
When you have Matai taking up hitups running hard, straight, with purpose, a decent step combined with sharpness it at least offers something/potential more than trundling and rolling over repeat predictable go forward sets.
"Fluffy" people tend to struggle in most areas of life so i'm glad i am broadening my appeal to a demographic that usually ignores or can't comprehend me.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 106 | 18 |
2 | Warriors | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 16 |
3 | Raiders | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 48 | 14 |
4 | Storm | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 76 | 12 |
5 | Cowboys | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | -14 | 11 |
6 | Sharks | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 49 | 10 |
7 | Broncos | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 46 | 10 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 10 |
9 | Tigers | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 |
10 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 10 |
11 | Rabbitohs | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | -62 | 10 |
12 | Dolphins | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 8 |
13 | Dragons | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -15 | 8 |
14 | Knights | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -52 | 8 |
15 | Titans | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -84 | 8 |
16 | Panthers | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -2 | 7 |
17 | Eels | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -121 | 6 |