News: Enough is enough, declares Gallop

Dan link said:
I will remind everyone that due to the terms of service you all agree to, you are responsible for everything you post and any consequences

OK no problem

can I wish for david
jl5abk.gif
to get a double dose of Hemorrhoids
 
All I can say without spitting the dummy and sounding like a complete lunatic is  ....I'M SEETHING.
 
It seems the entirety of Gallop's charge against Stewart is that he was allegedly refused service of alcohol and asked to leave a licenced premises used for a function.  That's it. 4 weeks suspension, and I can't remember a single player being suspended for even 1 week for this ... EVER.

A year later the exact same thing happened to Laurie Daley.  (reported 1/4/09) He was fuming because he says he hadn't even had one drink.  Is it possible that people responsible for determining when people have had enough to drink make errors?  Is it possible that Daley wasn't drunk.  Is it possible Brett wasn't?

If so, how can Gallop or the NRL set themselves up as judge, jury and executioner?  How can they be so inconsistent?

All it takes for Gallop to win is for Manly to do nothing.
 
as I understand it Brett wasnt the only one that night asked to leave the premises, In that case who were the others and why were they not sanctioned either
 
This comp is run like a dictatorship.Time for the leader with no credibility to fall on his sword.This could get very ugly.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
24 19 5 148 44
24 17 7 212 40
24 16 8 120 38
24 15 9 172 36
24 15 9 109 36
24 14 10 21 34
24 13 10 107 33
24 13 11 132 32
24 12 12 125 30
24 12 12 21 30
24 10 14 -76 26
24 9 14 -146 25
24 9 15 -135 24
24 9 15 -181 24
24 8 16 -130 22
24 6 18 -199 18
24 6 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom