TheSoaringEagle2023
Bencher
Start with a better hooker first. We get nothing else except tackling from the current 9.Schuster cannot start next week, I don’t care if we start with 12 men. The bloke needs to be banished!
|
||
---|---|---|
Sea Eagles |
Vs |
Panthers |
12 |
4 Pines Park 10 Aug 2023 19:50 80:00 minute |
24 |
Sea Eagles | Stat | Panthers |
2 | Tries | 4 |
2/0 | Conversions | 4/2 |
/ | Penalty Goals | / |
0/0 | Field Goals/Attempts | 0/1 |
47% | Posession | 53% |
10 / 31 (31/41%) | Incomplete / Complete Sets ( Rate% ) | 7 / 37 (37/44%) |
41 | Time in Opposition Half | 59 |
1324m | Metres Gained | 1610m |
6 | Penalties (Conceded) | 4 |
1 | Dropouts | 1 |
11 | Errors | 7 |
4/ | Dummy Half Runs/Metres | 2/ |
24/802 | Kicks/Kick Metres | 23/683 |
29/326 | Missed Tackles/Tackles | 37/282 |
Start with a better hooker first. We get nothing else except tackling from the current 9.Schuster cannot start next week, I don’t care if we start with 12 men. The bloke needs to be banished!
Tonight was an absolute shambles.
Penrith were off - they were way off in fact.
The game was there to be won.
We needed to get into the grind rather than kick the ball away on tackle one.
Can't wait to hear Siebold.
I usually stick up for Schuster but tonight he reminds me of the flashy kid with all the moves playing touch at the park with the rest of the kids without a care in the world.
Well, he did and with a smile, wish he could be more like Demetriou, snarly and pissed off.Hope Seibold brings up all the knock on's missed by Sutton and the bunker bunnies.
Siebold was so happy he was grinning from ear to ear. He must have said how proud he was ten times. It got a bit awkward at the end when a reporter asked - "at 12 all you were right in the game, then you kicked on tackle one and the Panthers run 60 metres to score. Can you understand why Manly supporters threw their arms in the air and asked what the hell is going on?"Hope Seibold brings up all the knock on's missed by Sutton and the bunker bunnies.
Or, to have Paseka, Lodge and Tommy around him would be just as good.If we had a Melbourne, Panthers, Broncos team around him, he'd be getting accolades, trust me. Schuster is a provider. When you're providing to.....well....let's just say not the greatest receivers, there's not much else anyone can do.
Or, to have Paseka, Lodge and Tommy around him would be just as good.
Yeah, I've backed this kid to the hilt but tonight did it for me. I don't know what's going on in his head but he's playing like he has either zero confidence and doesn't know what to do or he just isn't up to it. I just wanted him to take the line on once with some venom and I never saw any real interest. He is simply catching and passing or doing crazy kick aheads instead of just taking a tackle. It's the 1st time I've dropped the F bomb out loud in the Stand when he did that (I dropped a 2nd one when Garrick kicked that ball) and it just said to me that he just isn't up to making rational footy decisions.I usually stick up for Schuster but tonight he reminds me of the flashy kid with all the moves playing touch at the park with the rest of the kids without a care in the world.
You could get 2 of those type of players for the price of 1 Luke Brooks.Guys, we need a Leota type forward and Martin type forward. Simple as that.
I find the ‘embracing realism’ comment to be ironic. Penrith were paying $1.10 and we were paying $7.10 for a reason. Great team vs also rans. It’s where we are at whether we like it or not.I'll answer that with this (this is how you embrace realism) - and provide accountability. Anyone who says they are proud of tonight's effort? I question their loyalty and dedication to our club:
Yeah I am not sure that Luke Brooks was the right signing. We could have got a Cogger or a Cust type player and spent some money on some good forwards.You could get 2 of those type of players for the price of 1 Luke Brooks.
Ben and Brad both out next week.Yeah, I've backed this kid to the hilt but tonight did it for me. I don't know what's going on in his head but he's playing like he has either zero confidence and doesn't know what to do or he just isn't up to it. I just wanted him to take the line on once with some venom and I never saw any real interest. He is simply catching and passing or doing crazy kick aheads instead of just taking a tackle. It's the 1st time I've dropped the F bomb out loud in the Stand when he did that (I dropped a 2nd one when Garrick kicked that ball) and it just said to me that he just isn't up to making rational footy decisions.
I was thinking that he seriously needs to go away and reinvent himself and Arthurs should be brought in for the 3 games. But then I thought, you know what, he needs to be put in the forwards next week and show the team that he has some ticker at least. There would be no escaping next week if Seibold does that. Being at the game, I don't what the reports are for Ben but if he's out, I'd be throwing him in the deep end next week and see if he's up to the challenge. Jake and Croker will not stand for any lazy BS and if he spits the dummy, then his career is in big trouble.
Man, I've never been so disappointed in a Manly player.
Where would you get those players from? I don't see anyone available like that or for that money. I'm not saying we shouldn't try and get those sort of players but we can't just pull them out of our backside.You could get 2 of those type of players for the price of 1 Luke Brooks.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |