Well, waking up and fearing another terrible headline, I can now go to work happy as Manly hasn't been linked to ISIS overnight.
Ap IS ai Koro IS au....have a good day at work Nicci.
Well, waking up and fearing another terrible headline, I can now go to work happy as Manly hasn't been linked to ISIS overnight.
Not a simple exercise banning it, with betting going offshore via the internet. But tough jobs can be more interesting than the simple ones. Banning it, and stopping the active promotion of betting like we've done with smoking might be a couple of starting points.
Rationally, betting makes no sense at all. It's blatantly obvious the odds are stacked against us, that it can corrupt and kill the sport we love, and can be addictively damaging to those we care about. But who said people are in any way rational?
Could not agree more.How significant a firming market like that is depends on how the agency's book is positioned and predominantly what the bookie holds on the match. I would imagine the amount held would be tiny on an Aus League match so a small bet from a desperate Rasta on the chase could cause a 20c shift.
To get big money on most would be in Aus because the market has so many players and it is a leading sport. There were no huge betting moves in the games in question and the biggest tell of all- no squealing moaning bookies. As the Sherriff said the other day- if there is a rort on they would be screaming from mountain tops.i have no doubt match fixing occurs in some form at times but the games in question just don't fit the bill.
The movement of money is hardly ever A to B.Unless the overseas betting agencies have ways of taking cash bets any money transferred to them will be easy to find electronically
It will be interesting to see if they discover if any NRL players have been betting on their teams to lose matches
They may not get anyone on match fixing charges but betting on your team to lose while they are playing in the same game will be enough to kiss their football careers goodbye
The 50k could have remained in the offshore betting account.If the last few posts are anything to indicate then they can kiss bye bye to a conviction based on overseas bets.
They need to find the alleged $50k per player, and that's either in an account OR a massive change in spending habits.
For example , " here's $10k darling go and buy yourself some dresses and jewellery and whilst doing that here's another $10k which should take care of the groceries , booze and incidentals for a few months".
Suddenly, apart from the expensive mortgage and luxury car loan nothing is going out of a persons account for 2 months.
That can't be too hard can it??
Look, I don't want any current or past player found guilty BUT if they are we need to cut out the clique , and move forward with a zero tolerance policy on players associating with these low life's.
How does that sound Joe ??? ( assuming you are glued to this like your assistant media manager).
The 50k could have remained in the offshore betting account.
Nobody knows anything of substance.
That's why all forms of media are enjoying their own spins on the heresay😕
Not a simple exercise banning it, with betting going offshore via the internet. But tough jobs can be more interesting than the simple ones. Banning it, and stopping the active promotion of betting like we've done with smoking might be a couple of starting points.
Rationally, betting makes no sense at all. It's blatantly obvious the odds are stacked against us, that it can corrupt and kill the sport we love, and can be addictively damaging to those we care about. But who said people are in any way rational?
Charlie Haggett, ex-cop and ex Eagles hooker. More likely to be just another example of management competence (or lack thereof) than related to this latest drama.I'm starting to wonder if the ultra quick departure of our newly announced football manager at the start of the year - his name just skipped out of my brain - who was a former cop , had anything to do with all this?
Just a thought.
My spin on it. I'm thinking that the concept of the scam was discussed for the Souths game but for whatever reason it never went ahead. Someone has coughed up that info in return for lighter punishment elsewhere (or reward) and that has the authorities interested. That is why there is some detail about what was planned but no obvious evidence in the markets and nothing obvious in that game. The Parra game is then thrown in because it did look sus in terms of effort and errors but then again there's no evidence and we actually almost won anyway.
This is most likely a shakedown and warning to the NRL and players and Manly's reputation is the unfortunate collateral damage. Defamed at the worst possible time given the sponsorship crap from FAL.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |