Thanks for the explanation. What then, was the upside of letting Lussick go?
Our roster is a work in progress we are currently working on signings, at the moment they are external not promotion from within.
In regards the cap position with Myles and Lussick the way it works is you can only have 30 players on NRL contracts players 30-26 are a minimum of 70k players 25-1 are a minimum for 100k. So if a player is paid a termination fee like Myles in 2018 or a player leaves mid season like Lussick and they fall within the above numbers they count as a position in the Top 30. My understanding is Lussick was on just over 400k so with 6 months gone he has been paid just over 200k that fits him well within our top 30 cost wise and as so, despite freeing up 200k from the cap he still takes a place and must remain on that list despite the fact he cant take the field for us. Similar to Myles who was paid part of his contract fee for this year, it also fits within the top 30 as such he uses up a place and means we can only have up to 28 players available each week at best.
Greenberg knew it would hurt us more in the long run... look at the Eels, they lost 12 points but received no reduction to their cap whatsoever. I’ve been saying this from the get go, Greenberg created a whole new set of rules regarding salary cap penalties when it came to us. He has basically handicapped us for another two years, yet when it came to the Eels, he wanted everything sorted out as quickly as possible so they could get back on with things. He even harped on about what a great club they were and how hard they had worked to turn things around, pointing out the importance for league to be strong in the West. It’s a farkin disgrace.The salary cap handicap is really biting hard, much harder than I thought it would. I now wish that we had a points penalty instead - e.g. start the season on minus whatever and potentially write this year off, but let us spend up to the cap and look to the future.
So who is the 9 if Api is out??
No need to worry API won’t be selected for origin Freddy will pick Cameron McGinnes IMO.
Surely there has to be some flexibility, that if a team is unable to name a top 30 squad due to season-ending injuries that a club should be allowed to introduce some rookies to replace them. It is madness that we list a player who has retired, taken the coin due to a career-ending injury and is laughing at us all the way into the bargain. In previous eras, young players would come in if there were injuries and learn their trade. It is madness that we could lose Fainu because we are not able to promote him. He truly is a gun and that would really suck if we lost him to a rival over this!
With such cap problems, it might be sensible to let the higher priced Api go, and keep the future star at a cheaper price. Just a thought.Fainu would be crazy to hang around considering Manly are hoping to re-sign Koroisau for another 3 years. It’s not as if he’ll be hanging around learning the craft from Cam Smith.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 4 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -8 | 0 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -16 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -22 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -30 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -36 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -38 | 0 |