Brooks is a good player he has played his best footy when he is the 2nd stringer ( I think he won his dally M when he was )This guy has never had it. Reinforced 10 fold tonight.
Simply does not bring enough to the table.
Needed to sack up and take over tonight
What good is he then, that’s his ****in role!The commentators said he hasn’t had a try assist since round 5.
He won a Dally M at the tigersAverage player always been average he couldnt even stand out at the tigers that says enough lol
The Sharks won a premiership with TownsendSaid it once and I will say it again, we wont win a premiership with Brooks in the halves. Good player, but not great. Greatness is what wins premierships. Next year will be a regression with aging halves. Meanwhile other teams are rushing through young talented halves even if it means copping some harsh losses. Better to lose with a youthful team than an old overage one. Arthur might be an ok backup player but hes not a starter.
You think maybe that’s the way they “prepared “ in “training” this weekIt’s a complete cop out to say the 7 jumper would have made a difference. It’s just a number, he was the senior player in the half’s tonight & could have taken control but he didn’t like usual. Same player he has always been except he has probably lost a bit of speed
I couldn’t believe how disinterested we were attacking bombs. I acknowledge that plenty of them were not great, but there were a few that presented opportunity while we lumbered up and took a defensive position.Yeeah him and Arthurs were bad but hardly any chasers getting up there for their kicks, very low energy performance from the outside back, and forwards too, just terrible really.
Your opinion is a valid one feathered friendThis is just my opinion, but I would seriously consider trying to move him on. I think he has a further 2 years after this year. He hasn’t delivered.
He was good, but Maloney was great.The Sharks won a premiership with Townsend
He is not the greatest
Over time Id like these two to be the next halves for the next few years...even if it means going through a few rough years.I wouldn’t be surprised if either Joey Walsh or Onitoni Large take Brooks place next year
The madness is the logic that Brooks somehow is the guy to fill DCE's shoes, when he was never brought over for that reason in the first place. He was brought in to at least give us a chance to win a premiership for as long as DCE was still around...now that plan has gone pear shaped.Your opinion is a valid one feathered friend
What Brookes has delivered to us was the same standard performance he delivered at the Tigers
He has never been a game Pressure Player
He will never be a Premiership winning player
Neither will Croker
Neither will Seibold be a Premiership winning coach
Persist with this class of People at our club and we Prolong our Premiership Winning aspirations
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 11 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 74 | 20 |
2 | Warriors | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 |
3 | Storm | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 135 | 16 |
4 | Raiders | 11 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 64 | 16 |
5 | Sharks | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 70 | 14 |
6 | Rabbitohs | 11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 14 |
7 | Cowboys | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | -32 | 13 |
8 | Broncos | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 42 | 12 |
9 | Sea Eagles | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 38 | 12 |
10 | Dragons | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -11 | 12 |
11 | Tigers | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | -54 | 12 |
12 | Dolphins | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 42 | 10 |
13 | Roosters | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -46 | 10 |
14 | Titans | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -100 | 10 |
15 | Panthers | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -2 | 9 |
16 | Knights | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -74 | 8 |
17 | Eels | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -99 | 8 |