I mean.........that's pretty funny haha
Jason Saab
- Thread starter Dion Johnson
- Start date
-
We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
I mean.........that's pretty funny haha
frank stokes
I discriminate indiscriminately
Agreed... gave me a giggle...
frank stokes
I discriminate indiscriminately
He was poorly used and then when they did go there the kicks were up-andown and landing 5m out - part the kickers fault and part Saab as he wasn't coming at speed and made it easy for defenders...
Unlike the dragons player that scored first (Lomax?) who was charging whe he leapt...
stoodamire
Bencher
This kid is a cat. Never rated him.
Confirmed when he dumped off the ball to Walker after a kick return
Confirmed when he dumped off the ball to Walker after a kick return
I was watching the game with a Saints supporter and we both thought that was hilarious
frank stokes
I discriminate indiscriminately
The lack of effort to get back to that ball in the first place was p*ss poor...
I still don't really have an opinion on the kid... Didn't know him before he signed with us, havnt seen him do anything yet.. but that can be in part the halves fault too...
But I dunno, I thought last year people were going a bit too heavy for my liking on the "Saab the saviour " bandwagon.. we got a relatively untested kid who couldn't get a start with the struggling dragons, and so far .. that's exactly how he's playing
But I dunno, I thought last year people were going a bit too heavy for my liking on the "Saab the saviour " bandwagon.. we got a relatively untested kid who couldn't get a start with the struggling dragons, and so far .. that's exactly how he's playing
CRPSI eagle
Reserve Grader
I see why the Saints let him go and had very little game time last year.
We must have better in our ranks.
We must have better in our ranks.
The ridiculous thing is they did it twice and the ball came down 10m out, so when Saab won the jump, was still nowhere near the line and he was barelled as anyone should be by a half decent defence, had to get that kick to drop over the try line to get a legitimate chance to score.
Same should have happened to Lomax, it was the most predictable kick of all time and they had just tried it 2 minutes earlier only for Lomax to spill another certain try.
How the hell an NRL team who know for a fact where the kick is going and the play was in slow motion when Lomax scored...that play against the Manly sides 2007 - 2013 would have smashed Lomax when he caught it 7m out, but last night Walker moves out the way and Garrick tickles him to go through basically untouched....and right on cue, from there the reliable white flag is raised and game over !!
Last edited:
Supreme Leader
Uber L77T playa
he's in good company? does anyone on this site really expect our team performance to change? I've got no confidence either
pjayz
הנשרים ישרור בעוד שנתיים מיום הנשרים
If we are going to persist with Garrick who has had plenty of first grade and is consistently bad, why should we drop a kid just trying to find his feet with plenty of tools to work with? He does need to put his body in front of people in defence - he arm grabs too often - but there is upside to him.
Spartan Eagle
Bencher
He's only had a few games in a misfiring squad. Doesn't help that Suli never passes to him. I want to give him a few more games before I nail him to a cross.
tookey
First Grader
Because DCE's kicks are useless - either too long or too short
He is in a backline which has no cohesion and a centre who couldn't set him up if he tried
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
7 | 6 | 1 | 54 | 14 |
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 59 | 12 |
|
7 | 5 | 2 | 36 | 12 |
|
8 | 5 | 2 | 39 | 11 |
|
8 | 5 | 3 | 64 | 10 |
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 53 | 10 |
|
8 | 4 | 4 | 73 | 8 |
|
7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 8 |
|
7 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 8 |
|
8 | 4 | 4 | -14 | 8 |
|
8 | 4 | 4 | -60 | 8 |
|
8 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 7 |
|
7 | 2 | 5 | -55 | 6 |
|
8 | 3 | 5 | -55 | 6 |
|
7 | 2 | 5 | -29 | 4 |
|
7 | 1 | 6 | -87 | 4 |
|
7 | 1 | 6 | -136 | 4 |
