Jake avoids ban

Kent reckons referees should be on the match review committee. Not former players. Imagine horsehead perenara and some other goose judging manly players. Jake woulda got 10 weeks.
 
I thought if anyone would have been dirty, I thought Sticky would be but no ,he defended Jake and said the refs got it right with Jake and wrong with Cotric, and I agree. Cotric shouldn't have been sent off, sin bin maybe but not sent off.
 
Got lucky there I think, was sure he would miss 1-2 weeks

we are owed more than 1 before things even up though
 
I’ve got no doubt the fact it was Jake, who is known as a clean player and who had just worked his arse off for 80-plus minutes, played some part in the MRC realising it was simply an accident.
Still I was surprised, thought he’d be gone for a week or 2.
 
haha, screw you creepy crawley. Not our fault you can't see hughes duck his head under instead of simply putting his arm out.

Plus Jake did get pinged and now has 75 carry over points.

#notrunbymedia
#noagendas
Creepy Crawley lol lol lol . Classic !
 
I’ve got no doubt the fact it was Jake, who is known as a clean player and who had just worked his arse off for 80-plus minutes, played some part in the MRC realising it was simply an accident.
Still I was surprised, thought he’d be gone for a week or 2.
Just goes to prove that Todd Greenberg and the NRL are doing all they can to get Manly into the Grand Final 😛😛😛
 
The match review committee is just that "a committee" They are very thorough in every charge they examine. How do I know this??? Well you guessed it my bro is part of the MRC... They ALL review and discuss each tackle and compare with other charges for similar tackles over the past couple years. Everything is taken into consideration when determining a grading. To an UNTRAINED EYE tackles that look very similar actually have very different aspects which is what leads to the difference in grading. Kent and others need to sit in the bunker and see the very diligent process that the follow for every grading before jumping around like a goose!!!
 
There is a lot of bad inconsistency going on. I do believe that Jake should have done at least a week on the sidelines, end of the day it was a horror tackle, not in the Cotric league but bad enough. You see the Canberra player got 5 weeks for a gouge and then that cretin McGuire gets slapped on the wrist with a wet lettuce!! bloody farce!
 
IMG_20190731_081325.jpg


Clearly shows that Jake's only contact is his right arm supporting the falling player.
Corey is also off the player @:cool:

Cotric was holding the player then jumped up and drove down to his left 😎

Luke's tackle was a cross between the 2 and by contesting it he added another week to his suspension @:cool:
 
Last edited:
View attachment 11996

Clearly shows that Jake's only contact is his right arm supporting the falling player.
Corey is also off the player @:cool:

Cotric was holding the player then jumped up and drove down to his left 😎

Luke's tackle was a crosd between the 2 and by contesting it he added another week to his suspension @:cool:
Thankyou!!! As mentioned earlier in the thread there is so much to consider when charging a player. This is a perfect example
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Back
Top Bottom