JAC (the fox) to maybe leave the storm

Pretty much all other teams when receiving a request for compassionate bye bye - Immediate grant given.

The storm: Only after one more season (2020) and only if they get just as good a player in return. (smh)

So as mentioned elsewhere... the fox wants out.




Now I'm not fully against the storm not wanting to be out of pocket here.... but I just can't remember another club denying the request for 12 months. He's also an Aust winger...so just what player would they accept in return? ($$$)

I see some parts of the media are trying to link the situation with the afl process, if only the games and rules were the same, they may have a point. It doesn't sound as compassionate as it's being made out to be.

Anyway...there you go.


edit: Sorry @40 nil . I was trying to merge my thread into yours, stuffed it up, dunno how to split 2 threads (that's something smart like @Jethro would know) and so I tried to remember what your thread title was. Just in case you're like wtf happened to my title? Plus it's late.
 
Last edited:
So the storm want: a player of equal value, or salary cap relief, or a transfer fee. How exactly would salary cap relief work??
 
What's the bet he goes to Souffs, who will they medically retire and then long term re employ this time to accommodate him?
 
This’ll test V’landys out. It’s the number one gripe in the game atm. Players breaking contracts at will. Ryan Matterson is a good example.
As much as I hate the Storm, the trend needs to stop. Im not saying JAC is not genuine in his request. But player agents are pond scum, and would sink to any depths to get their player (and themselves) a better deal.
 
player agents are pond scum,

images-1.jpeg
 
This’ll test V’landys out. It’s the number one gripe in the game atm. Players breaking contracts at will. Ryan Matterson is a good example.
As much as I hate the Storm, the trend needs to stop. Im not saying JAC is not genuine in his request. But player agents are pond scum, and would sink to any depths to get their player (and themselves) a better deal.

What I hate is that players want to go on "compassionate grounds" yet they also always get a better contract.

Bring in a rule that says you can't accept a contract for a greater value than the one you have for the length remaining on that contract. How many would want to move then?
 
What I hate is that players want to go on "compassionate grounds" yet they also always get a better contract.

Bring in a rule that says you can't accept a contract for a greater value than the one you have for the length remaining on that contract. How many would want to move then?

True, but the new club would just work their magic with third party payments or alternatively what we know as 'the roosters way of doing business.'
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Bulldogs 13 11 0 2 98 26
2 Raiders 14 11 0 3 96 24
3 Warriors 13 10 0 3 35 24
4 Storm 12 8 0 4 171 22
5 Sharks 14 8 0 6 26 18
6 Dolphins 14 7 0 7 146 16
7 Broncos 13 6 0 7 44 16
8 Roosters 13 6 0 7 -18 16
9 Panthers 13 5 1 7 -9 15
10 Cowboys 13 5 1 7 -106 15
11 Sea Eagles 14 6 0 8 22 14
12 Dragons 13 5 0 8 -59 14
13 Tigers 13 5 0 8 -62 14
14 Rabbitohs 14 6 0 8 -88 14
15 Knights 14 5 0 9 -69 12
16 Eels 13 4 0 9 -105 12
17 Titans 13 4 0 9 -122 12
Back
Top Bottom