A contrary opinion is not nonsense. Can’t you just discuss idea without the bitterness?In July last year I penned this report on Saab ... which met with the usual nonsense ..
In that case, do you think players should be rotated according to which team we're playing or the prevailing weather conditions? This makes sense to me and would parallel cricket where fast bowlers or spinners are selected according to the nature of the wicket. In this way, players such as Koula, Weekes, Tuipulotu, Burbo, Sipley, De Luis etc. would accrue NRL experience more quickly plus maintain match fitness.We won’t score a plethora of length of the field tries against the likes of Melbourne and Penrith, but you can guarantee they’ll have us pinned on our line. That’s where Tui can be of value.
A contrary opinion is not nonsense. Can’t you just discuss idea without the bitterness?
Personally, I think you’ve got a point with Saab. Yes, his speed is asset and he is good under the high ball. However, in tight games against the big teams, strong yardage carries are going to be more valuable than speed. One look at what Addo-Carr is doing at Canterbury right now says that speed is useless if it can’t be untapped. We won’t score a plethora of length of the field tries against the likes of Melbourne and Penrith, but you can guarantee they’ll have us pinned on our line. That’s where Tui can be of value.
And I haven’t even mentioned Saab’s inability to get down to rolling balls and he has a turning circle like a Mack truck.
A contrary opinion is not nonsense. Can’t you just discuss idea without the bitterness?
Personally, I think you’ve got a point with Saab. Yes, his speed is asset and he is good under the high ball. However, in tight games against the big teams, strong yardage carries are going to be more valuable than speed. One look at what Addo-Carr is doing at Canterbury right now says that speed is useless if it can’t be untapped. We won’t score a plethora of length of the field tries against the likes of Melbourne and Penrith, but you can guarantee they’ll have us pinned on our line. That’s where Tui can be of value.
And I haven’t even mentioned Saab’s inability to get down to rolling balls and he has a turning circle like a Mack truck.
Great point re playing the best teams. Yardage significantly more valuable than speed over 100m (and Tui is not exactly Parker when it comes to speed, he's no slouch) Acceleration off the mark is truly where the advantage lies, from marker etc and Tui would be a superior option for us at this stageA contrary opinion is not nonsense. Can’t you just discuss idea without the bitterness?
Personally, I think you’ve got a point with Saab. Yes, his speed is asset and he is good under the high ball. However, in tight games against the big teams, strong yardage carries are going to be more valuable than speed. One look at what Addo-Carr is doing at Canterbury right now says that speed is useless if it can’t be untapped. We won’t score a plethora of length of the field tries against the likes of Melbourne and Penrith, but you can guarantee they’ll have us pinned on our line. That’s where Tui can be of value.
And I haven’t even mentioned Saab’s inability to get down to rolling balls and he has a turning circle like a Mack truck.
He shocked both Panthers and Storm last year with long range tries when the rest of the team could barely score otherwise. That scoring potential is not something we can afford to pass on.We won’t score a plethora of length of the field tries against the likes of Melbourne and Penrith, but you can guarantee they’ll have us pinned on our line. That’s where Tui can be of value.
I’m not worried about his defence...a winger’s defence will rarely ever be the difference between winning and losing.I actually think his defence this year has been relatively solid. Nothing spectacular of course. He's not suddenly turned into the Jake Trbojevic of the Usain Bolt set. But he has attempted 32 tackles so far in 2022, and made 26 of them. For a winger who can't tackle, a tackle efficiency of 81.2% (according to the NRL website) isn't too bad (Sam Walker only tackles at 78% and I don't see Saab being used as a speed bump like the Chooks 5/8 often is). OK, sure, hardly any, if any, of Saab's tackling was a one on one tackle. But he's not out there because he's a tackling machine.
I’m not the least bit concerned about his defence.He shocked both Panthers and Storm last year with long range tries when the rest of the team could barely score otherwise. That scoring potential is not something we can afford to pass on.
Especially when the reason for our losses to the big guns has been fairly well identified as giving up possession cheaply then our forwards not being strong enough to regain the ascendancy. Rather than multiple misses by a tall winger.
I value yardage out of our own end and being able to finish a try more valuable than raw speed.I’m not worried about his defence...a winger’s defence will rarely ever be the difference between winning and losing.
My concern is his yardage carries and work rate out of yardage are not up to FG standard. Also, he can be a Gumby.
But...he has plenty of upside so if he stays in the side, it’s not the end of the world.
No one is howling, we’re just discussing footy and the merits of individual players; that’s the point of the forum. Your lack of perceptive awareness of this, is what’s laughable.So unless Saab scores another 26 the Silvertails brains trust will howl for him to be replaced by Tui or Koula, gonna tell us we need some SPEEEEED KILLS? Laughable stuff, I'll have whatever you guys are smoking.
It's the $64 question. Walker only getting a one-year deal will clear the log-jam a little, from 2023.Des can't hold out Tui and Koula much longer. I see great potential in those 2.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |