We love to be under the radar. Unfortunately on this occasion we are under the radar because we are irrelevant.Does that mean we are back under the radar MFB?
It took a lot to get there!.
NYEagle
What a shock to see his media mates join in
But I do like MG's response
![]()
Home – Triple M
www.triplem.com.au
![]()
"How dare you!": MG's brutal takedown of Paul Kent • The Western Weekender
Penrith legend Mark Geyer has launched a scathing attack on News Corp journalist Paul Kent, who brought Geyer's family into the Ricky Stuart saga.westernweekender.com.au
Players who bring the game into disrepute are banned from playing so I don't see a difference. A man with stickys experience should know better, especially with his history of engaging mouth before brainThe NRL has banned Stuart from coaching the Raiders for the next week, he can't attend their game on Sunday or communicate with the players. Doesn't this punish the team/club/fans as much as himself? I don't get the logic behind this or am I missing something?
He's also been personally fined $25K, which is fair enough as he 'crossed the line' using the presser for his own purposes rather than what its meant for. To my way of thinking, this is a personal issue which really has nothing to do with the Raiders so they shouldn't be 'penalised' for it.
The NRL has banned Stuart from coaching the Raiders for the next week, he can't attend their game on Sunday or communicate with the players. Doesn't this punish the team/club/fans as much as himself? I don't get the logic behind this or am I missing something?
He's also been personally fined $25K, which is fair enough as he 'crossed the line' using the presser for his own purposes rather than what its meant for. To my way of thinking, this is a personal issue which really has nothing to do with the Raiders so they shouldn't be 'penalised' for it.
I know right? I can't believe how the NRL has rewarded him for his actions...The NRL has banned Stuart from coaching the Raiders for the next week, he can't attend their game on Sunday...
Kent insinuating that people would be on Ricky's side if they knew the details is hilarious...Kent also thinks if he talks the loudest then his opinions are more valid. His latest strategy is to throw out a few indignant swear words in order to make himself look tough; I get the feeling that his ego is overtaking his objectivity and eventually this will taint his credibility; if it hasn't already.
Kent insinuating that people would be on Ricky's side if they knew the details is hilarious...
1. The kid was 12
2. Rick stepped in to give a gobfull to a 12yo... not his dad, the kid
3. It is 12 years later and this grown ass adult still has not let it go
4. Rick conflated his personal opinion of a bloke, formed 12 years ago when he made his little boy cry, with 'analysis' of a common football incident...
Jaeman Salmon could have stabbed his son at a church event and people still would not think Rick was stable or his comments justified... OK maybe that would be enough...
A. You are assuming you know a whole lotHe was 12, not 5. If the 12 year old is big enough to bully a kid about his autistic sister then he’s big enough to cop a spray from an adult.
“Making his little boy cry”, yeah the sensitive kid is the one to belittle here, not the bully who gets his kicks teasing severely autistic kids.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -8 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -22 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -30 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -36 | 0 |