Got back from the game...

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by c_eagle, Jun 11, 2005.



Share This Page

  1. c_eagle

    By:c_eagleJun 11, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    We were pathetic. There's not too much else to say really, just get the whip out at training, welcome our forwards back and look to improve 1000% at Brookvale next week. Embaressment is a big motivational tool, add to that, the potential embaressment of losing at home to the winless Knights, we should be back to normal in a hurry. We can't afford to lose next week, it sounds obvious but it's pretty much a black and white proposition.
     
  2. byso

    By:bysoJun 11, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    99
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    44-6. When manly are bad there shocking.

    C how did Monas play?
     
  3. c_eagle

    By:c_eagleJun 11, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    We had limited opportunities in attack but when we were in their 20 it looked static. The forwards were really poor and we got dominated in the ruck area, therefore we were heading backwards. The kicking game was pretty sound from what I remember. Our defense was also really poor on the fringes, fa'alogo was making metres with ease.

    The turning point came about 40 seconds after half time, it looked like we scored in the corner to close the margin to 4 with a kick to come and we were denied what looked to be a fair try. It was downhill from there.

    Souths played really well though, their completion rate must have been up around 85%. We couldn't buy an error and I guess it comes down to lack of defensive pressure.

    As I said earlier, dwelling on this game is almost useless, there were no positives. I think the only 3 players who stood up were Glenn Stewart, Watmough and Willow. Alberts was pretty good in attack and should start ahead of Stephenson. I'm not sure about his defense though, I have to watch a replay. I don't remember any glaring errors but I had my hands in my head for a fair amount of the 2nd half.
     
  4. c_eagle

    By:c_eagleJun 11, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Another positive was the crowd. It was very much 50/50.
     
  5. byso

    By:bysoJun 11, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    99
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    Thanks mate. So the forwards were no good.

    A little hypothetical! How do you think Orford would have gone tonight then if he was fortunate enough to be playing with tonight’s pack?
     
  6. c_eagle

    By:c_eagleJun 11, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Umm.... It's hard to say because we did have some opportunities early, it could have been a different game had we taken those. In saying that, Orford wouldn't have been able to do much in the second half because we just weren't going over the advantage line. It was have been tough as hell for any halfback tonight.
     
  7. byso

    By:bysoJun 11, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    99
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    Thanks for your "impartial" view.

    btw i'm damn pissed we got smashed..............But when there bad there shocking!
     
  8. Garts

    By:GartsJun 11, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,599
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +941 /25
    Alberts did miss a few tackles, also made a few good ones so I would not say he is poor defender.

    I was impressed with his attack. He provides the spark we need out wide, I will love to see him in action when the forwards are actually going forward.
     
  9. c_eagle

    By:c_eagleJun 11, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    I definitely agree with that. Buddy Gordan had a few air swings at him. I'll have to watch the replay (if I can bare it,) to determine his defensive ability.
     
  10. KaZa

    By:KaZaJun 11, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,159
    Likes Received:
    203
    Likes Given:
    19
    Ratings:
    +412 /29
    Any halfback would of struggled Byso. Our forwards got creamed in the middle of the ruck. They made so many breaks and so much yards through the middle. It was embarassing. We really did miss the 5 or so players that were out missing.

    Experience cost us this game. Heads dropped at 24-6 with 20 to go...

    at 14-6.. Kings try was dissallowed.. big turning point.. looked fine at the game.. what was wrong with it?
     
  11. Garts

    By:GartsJun 11, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,599
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +941 /25
    he missed 3 that I recall, 1 from a kick off where they made a break. However he also made a few solid tackles on the tryline, I am sure he is our best centre option.
     
  12. Downie

    By:DownieJun 11, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    3
    Likes Given:
    20
    Ratings:
    +3 /0
    In my opinion, nothing. He seemed to get the ball grounded and didn't actually touch the corner post/go out (it was the South's players that rolled over him that did), so I can't see why Souths got a scrum for it, because even if he was held up we should have got a play the ball seeing as it was only the 3rd tackle. :/

    Probably the turning point of the match, as everything went downhill from there.
     
  13. PEPSI

    By:PEPSIJun 11, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    1
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 /0
    agree, no idea how souths got that feed, he didnt lose it did he ?

    Alberts is our #1 centre as far as im concerned, you have to take into account that we have watched Steppa/Matai all year in a winning team. Alberst looked more dangerous in a team getting smashed! i guess next week will give us a better indication, hope he gets picked.
     
  14. KaZa

    By:KaZaJun 11, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,159
    Likes Received:
    203
    Likes Given:
    19
    Ratings:
    +412 /29
    thats true too. He may score a hatrick when we have more ball. What we all will agree on is we cant judge him on this one performance.
     
  15. Fluffy

    By:FluffyJun 12, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,542
    Likes Received:
    1,889
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,932 /271
    witt was sh!thouse

    bye bye survivor
     
  16. SilentBob

    By:SilentBobJun 12, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    3
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    Jim Curtis wins the Barry Crocker award.
    Luke Williamson - MOM

    Souths decided to go out and dominate early in the forwards knowing Kennedy, Kite etc wouldn't be there and they did it easily.

    The bench was absolute crap, 130m or so between the 4 of them.

    Dunley... What was with his crab, crab, crab, useless pass thing? He should just run the ball, that's what he's paid for.

    Alberts looked good to me, he looked like making a break most times he ran the ball, his defence is ok, some great round the ankle Menzies style tackles but then that leaves the ball free...

    Harris, as always, good for a crucial error at some point.

    King keeps on living up to the reputation he has on these forums.

    Monas looked like he was trying but I don't think he has the skills. He's got a good kicking and passing game but there just isn't a lot of creativity, I'm not just talking about last night too.

    I'd like to see Witt at halfback for a game just to see how he goes running the side and Monas at hooker, but that won't happen until the trials next year, if ever, I think.
     
  17. DVS Matt

    By:DVS MattJun 12, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    14
    Likes Given:
    13
    Ratings:
    +33 /0
    it did look fine at first glance, but on replay you could see his foot slide over the sideline before he got the ball down :-(
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top