So if the hill goes how can that space only hold 4300 ? Something doesn't seem to add up there
lovefooty said:manlywarringah said:In a design that was posted a year or so ago, they were keeping the hill and building a grandstand behind it.
The hill may be smaller than what it is now but i thought there was at least half the hill in front of the new stand.
I also thought they were trying to put terrace type of seating in front of the Jane Try Stand all the way down to the fence.
I'd imagine there would be a few different versions depending on costs.
A smaller hill is a must for me as i'd hate to see it go altogether but love the idea of a stand behind it to house more comfortable seating and corporates.
We need the corporate dollars coming in to match the other teams.
I asked a director today and was told there will be no hill on the eastern side. Its gone.
I was told that if the hill stayed then manly would be playing out of the S F S. Thats the commerical reality of it.
I loved the hill but I love the eagles more and want them to keep playing out of Brookie.
Not a hard choice.
Well done to Kerry Sibraa for his hard work again.
Kiwi Eagle said:So if the hill goes how can that space only hold 4300 ? Something doesn't seem to add up there
Kiwi Eagle said:So if the hill goes how can that space only hold 4300 ? Something doesn't seem to add up there
StuBoot said:What is the capacity of the Jane Try stand?Kiwi Eagle said:So if the hill goes how can that space only hold 4300 ? Something doesn't seem to add up there
CAMBO said:Hope the club can do some like the roosters chook pen where's there's a unreserved section members can sit together as a supporters group.
manlywarringah said:In a design that was posted a year or so ago, they were keeping the hill and building a grandstand behind it.
The hill may be smaller than what it is now but i thought there was at least half the hill in front of the new stand.
simon_eagle said:manlywarringah said:In a design that was posted a year or so ago, they were keeping the hill and building a grandstand behind it.
The hill may be smaller than what it is now but i thought there was at least half the hill in front of the new stand.
Was this the design you are talking about mate?
I must admit, I think this is about keeping the hill for the sake of it. Not sure it's practical.
http://tinypic.com/r/30aqjw9/5
manlywarringah said:I'd be disappointed in the entire hill going but maybe their original designs didn't work with trying to build a stand behind the hill. I wondered how they would actually be able to do it.
I don't sit there anyway as i have a seat in the Jane Try Stand but the hill is so popular. I agree that comfortable seating is a priority as well as more corporate seats. We need the dollars.
If the new design can't cater for 20,000 people on game day, i think we will still have to move some of the bigger games away. A capacity of 17-19000 is about what it is now. It would be nice to think 30 million could get us a couple more thousand seats somehow.
We need to compete with the more popular teams who drag in over 20,000 a few times each year.
As long as we play 8 to 10 games a year at Brookie, i'll be very happy.
simon_eagle said:manlywarringah said:In a design that was posted a year or so ago, they were keeping the hill and building a grandstand behind it.
The hill may be smaller than what it is now but i thought there was at least half the hill in front of the new stand.
Was this the design you are talking about mate?
I must admit, I think this is about keeping the hill for the sake of it. Not sure it's practical.
http://tinypic.com/r/30aqjw9/5
Mals said:Anyone on Silvertails a structural engineer? I doubt it would be possible to safely, substantially increase the height of the existing stands.The Who said:HappilyManly said:Wish they built a Northern Stand instead, connected to the Jane Try Stand.
It would stop the winter winds and have the same seating capacity as the eastern hill :idea:
I agree. I'd also like to see the existing stands improved and heightened to increase seating capacity before they touch the Hill.
It would be a sad day if the Hill was dug up, but if it is the only way that we get to play at Brokkie then so be it. I just believe there are other options that should be considered first.
simon64 said:At the moment, the stands look like they have been cut and pasted from various grounds from different eras. I hope Abbott doesn't withhold the money. Labor will crucify him if he does. Lets all hope construction starts sooner rather than later. I'd love to see Manly's future at Brookvale sured up.
Our Future is Brookvale oval and also the Liberal parties economic polices and I believe our local hero Abbott will deliver on both counts .simon64 said:I know we all love the hill but we have to accept that this is just the way it has to be.
The alternative of the SFS is just too unpalatable to even contemplate.
At the moment, the stands look like they have been cut and pasted from various grounds from different eras. I hope Abbott doesn't withhold the money. Labor will crucify him if he does. Lets all hope construction starts sooner rather than later. I'd love to see Manly's future at Brookvale sured up.
manlywarringah said:In a design that was posted a year or so ago, they were keeping the hill and building a grandstand behind it.
The hill may be smaller than what it is now but i thought there was at least half the hill in front of the new stand.
manlywarringah said:I think it was when they were having the council asking for ideas as to what they would like done with Brookvale Park. I remember someone gave a link and there were designs as to what the new ground would look like.
One design had another tier on top of the Jane Try Stand and there was another design with a stand behind the hill. It was to be connected to the Fulton/Menzies Stand.
Good luck finding it. I'm sure some whiz will be able to retrieve it from somewhere.
Jethro said:http://yoursaywarringah.com.au/document/show/304
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 70 | 10 |
3 | Raiders | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 46 | 10 |
4 | Warriors | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -18 | 10 |
5 | Broncos | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 54 | 8 |
6 | Sharks | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 8 |
7 | Dragons | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 8 |
8 | Rabbitohs | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -36 | 8 |
9 | Cowboys | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -42 | 8 |
10 | Tigers | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 6 |
11 | Dolphins | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 6 |
12 | Sea Eagles | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 6 |
13 | Titans | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -36 | 6 |
14 | Knights | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -60 | 6 |
15 | Panthers | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -10 | 4 |
16 | Roosters | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -80 | 4 |
17 | Eels | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -123 | 2 |