32-0 was diabolical, but just from looking at how all the scoring was at one end of the field, the wind clearly was worth like 20 points or so. If we didn't gain even more injuried players to the point we ended up with a 1 man bench, I seriously think we could have caught the Sharks.
Yes harper had a terrible game. I have a soft spot for Harper because when he came into the team last year, he added quite a lot of enthusiasm and played better than Suli. But I agree as the season got longer his form dropped and never really recovered. To be honest with the amount of strapping he has, feel like he's had niggling injuries for a while. Time for him to see if he can recover and regain some form and confidence in reserve grade.
If the team had given up and the Sharks had run up a cricket score, I can understand the doom and gloom, but we only just ran out of puff while missing 3/4 of our prop rotation, missing Trbojevic, missing Schuster and in game lost Walker, Paseka, Davey.
Geez we have some harsh markers on the forum.
Yep, there is the glass half empty and the glass half full types.
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't happy at 32-0 at halftime ( especially getting texts from mates saying "enjoying your birthday" ) but I've also watched enough footy to know that a wind like that can't be understated - the old days of 6-8 pt wind is now like an 18-20 pt wind and momentum is hard to stop when a team gets on a roll.
Our completion rates were pretty good, we just didn't have enough ball and Talaki had a day out that players have sometimes - do we forget what sort of performances Turbo put out last year, game after game? Yes, Talaki was aided and abetted by some of our defence but we can't begrudge him a game like that, he's certainly put other teams on notice.
Missing Josh and Marty plus Keppie can't be underestimated, we haven't lost this year when Josh has played.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing as the move to put Koula on the bench was to cover concerns about Harper's COVID recovery, yes, maybe he shouldn't have started but he earned the right to start based on what he showed last year, that's how Des works.
We showed serious ticker to make a game of it when at halftime it looked like it could be 50+.
There'll be a lot that don't agree with me but if you look at the final score and stats without knowing what the halftime score was you'd probably say fair enough, they were a bit better over the course of the match.
Is there really any difference if it was, say 16-6 at halftime and ended up 34-22?
Would people feel better?
I think we'll take a lot out of that second half, we played the long game v the Knights and blew the score out at the back end. We've seen the emergence of Tippy - who I must admit hadn't really set my world on fire but now he's a regular for me - and Koula plus Garrick has stepped up and Guac too.
I must be going soft in my old age.