Dude .... haven't heard that in 20 years .... now you are even an embarrassment to old people ...
Anyway give me another laugh ... tell me again that you believe that in 3 years Baz was not responsible for the recruitment of one player ... FMD ....
Des Hasler!
- Thread starter Kevinward777
- Start date
Dude .... haven't heard that in 20 years .... now you are even an embarrassment to old people ...
Anyway give me another laugh ... tell me again that you believe that in 3 years Baz was not responsible for the recruitment of one player ... FMD ....
40 years an eagle
Bencher
Dumb dog with a bone, looking dumber every post.
"Not responsible for recruiting any players IN OUR 30."
I'm done, go hard numbnuts.
Kevinward777
First Grader
It is now apparent that Des has already implemented new defensive structures, and that he is squeezing every ounce of potential from certain players who were regarded as journeymen, rookies, or NSW Cup standard before the season began. But for mine, his biggest impact has been on our forwards.
We have had the makings of a scary pack for the past three seasons, yet they seemed to lack that killer instinct, often running out of puff and allowing teams to carve us up through the middle. With AFB back this weekend, we may just have the best 8-17 in entire competition.
We have had the makings of a scary pack for the past three seasons, yet they seemed to lack that killer instinct, often running out of puff and allowing teams to carve us up through the middle. With AFB back this weekend, we may just have the best 8-17 in entire competition.
Last edited:
tookey
First Grader
Fulton did most of the hiring while Barrett was coach
Not suggesting for one minute Fulton wasn't heavily involved .... just objecting to the complete stupidity of saying that there is not one player in our 30 that Baz recruited .....
It is just another level of numbnuttedness to say on one hand everything is the coach Barrtt's fault ... no excuses ... and then when it appears we have a good squad ... the same numbnuts say oh, but Baz the coach had nothing to do with recriutment and retension .. he had no say whatsoever in the team .....
Smokin Joe
Bencher
I would hazard a guess that Keppie,Waddell,Elgey,Hodkinson,Suli,Garrick and Elliot would all be Barrett signings..would think that all the rest apart from Boyle and Smith might be Bozo.
HappilyManly
Journey Man
Croker in yesterday's article credits Baz with giving him a chance at Manly too
Smokin Joe
Bencher
Yep,there would be others that Baz had a hand in like Croker,Sipley,Gosiewski,Thompson and possibly others,but I think people are asking about guys that were purely Barrett with no hint of Bozo...Croker in yesterday's article credits Baz with giving him a chance at Manly too
MadMarcus
Toovey for NRL CEO
Not sure if this was deliberate or not but LOL either way
redlineg
Reserve Grader
It is not the quantity of the signings that count.
It is what you DO with them that counts.
Last year we had what looked like a group of individuals doing their best with the information they were given.
This year, we have a group of individuals that look like a team, with everyone knowing their roles and responsibilities within the team.
Onwards and Upwards from here (I hope)
Smokin Joe
Bencher
That is good,I was just suggesting who might have signed who,not sure what the quantity has to do with it.I stay out of the Barrett/Hasler arguments,so please don't make my comments somehow involved,cheers....
Class of 96
Bencher
Anderson really articulated that perfectly and was bang on how a football club should operate. Well said madam.
vultures...the lot of them!
ManEagle
Just a Man and his Eagle
Bloody sausage roll eating journalistic warriors
better not write a bad word, or will be salmonella next time
Kevinward777
First Grader
Dessie’s back.., Back again!
pt73
Bencher
And what a difference he has made, our defence is relentless.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
