Cambo said:I find it hypocritcal that we get a thread like this saying lets ditch this player and that player to stay under the cap. Then when in another thread we are questioning players loyalty because they want maximum dollars.
Earnie the Eagle said:I think I liked it better where all we worried about was who we were playing next week and not who would be playing for us next year.
swoop said:Earnie the Eagle said:I think I liked it better where all we worried about was who we were playing next week and not who would be playing for us next year.
That's why the NRL needs some sort of system so this doesn't happen.
Stevo said:I might have a holiday from this forum. Nothing new everyday. Just more rumours, speculation and uninformed scaremongering!
arty said:And whatever we contribute to this forum means absolutely nothing in respect of retention outcomes as decisions will be made by those who are required to make these and many vital related factors are unknown to us Stevo, enjoy the holiday.
g'day all,if you said to dce this time last yearwhen he signed his $100,000 or whatever contract that this timenext year he would be apremiership winner,an australian representative playerand one of the hottest properties in the game im sure he would of said yeah keep dreamin' pal as much as he would have liked to believe it,in fact im certain no one here or from the club would.So i would like to think that dce can understand that no one could foresee his meteoric rise and show theclub abit of consideration in current negotiations.MadMarcus said:Cambo said:I find it hypocritcal that we get a thread like this saying lets ditch this player and that player to stay under the cap. Then when in another thread we are questioning players loyalty because they want maximum dollars.
I agree with this 100% Cambo. I'm astounded that some people, as mere fans with nothing really on the line (except bragging rights as premiers), voice their opinions that we should ditch long-serving players on a whim, but in the next breath they expect our star players to give up their enormous earning potential to stay for "loyalty".
DCE's situation needs to be addressed asap. I appreciate that we probably can't give him the rise he deserves this year because of salary cap restrictions and I am sure he will understand that, but the kid has earnt his pay day.
The players' pay rates have been artificially suppressed by the cap. This is a reason why players have been lured to England, or to rugby, or even to AFL.TerryRandall said:Whats the point of the new TV deal if it all goes towards inflating player salaries?
Cambo said:I find it hypocritcal that we get a thread like this saying lets ditch this player and that player to stay under the cap. Then when in another thread we are questioning players loyalty because they want maximum dollars.
SeaEagleRock8 said:I'm a bit concerned about our roster for 2016.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
3 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
4 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Sharks | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 49 | 10 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 10 |
8 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
9 | Tigers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
10 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
11 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 8 |
12 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
13 | Dolphins | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -117 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |