Coach Seibold thoughts so far.... so good

Because you have more time to read every thread, does not mean those who don't are disrespect....but now you mention it, I pointed out the "7 minute Seibold chat" which was not repeating anything and 7 other Silvertails liked or appreciated this as something "new", so you obviously didn't read my post....pretty weird right ??
So don't give me the "not cool" cue and try following your own advice before posting next time hey
Hey mate, no offence. I enjoy your posts, always thoughtful. I was just coming more from a housekeeping perspective - having a single thread makes it a bit easier for everyone to avoid repetition and also to avoid missing things. No biggie. Cheers.
 
Hey mate, no offence. I enjoy your posts, always thoughtful. I was just coming more from a housekeeping perspective - having a single thread makes it a bit easier for everyone to avoid repetition and also to avoid missing things. No biggie. Cheers.
Hey feathered friend , I also enjoy your posts but I will respectfully disagree with you .
The more threads the more memes the more more passion the Better
More is Better
I cant Get enough
Bring it on !
 
Hey mate, no offence. I enjoy your posts, always thoughtful. I was just coming more from a housekeeping perspective - having a single thread makes it a bit easier for everyone to avoid repetition and also to avoid missing things. No biggie. Cheers.
I know that mate, but in this case I knew there was a Seibold coach thread "or 8", but felt this was a differing view not about his coaching, more a key point between "the players " and Seibold that was now decsending into Mestrovs involvement also....pretty major differences imo
I think I done a post about Hoppa and thrrr were 6 after that. But I didn't break out the tissues as felt they also may have a different angle
I hope the long explanation makes some sense - just for you mate, cause I also like your stuff so we are all good 😅
 
Last edited:
I know that mate, but in this case I knew there was a Seibold coach thread "or 8", but felt this was a differing view not about his coaching, more a key point between "the players " and Seibold that was now decsending into Mestrovs involvement also....pretty major differences imo
I think I done a post about Hoppa and thrrr were 6 after that. But I didn't break out the tissues as felt they also may have a different angle
I hope the long explanation makes some sense - just for you mate, cause I also like your stuff so we are all good 😅
1750139637292.webp
 
I would say that his extended contract would have a performance clause in it, if it doesn't then I would say that our management would be the dumbest around, surely our management can't be that stupid,surely.
Without ‘performance’ would have thought the clause legally is null and void
 
I think it turned out to be a good idea putting turbo at centre. That 2nd half was the best he has played in a while, the try assist on half time did so much for him. Of course the heat is still on massively but I’ll give credit for sticking it out after Hoppa’s poor first 40
 
Tonight's win was the equivalent of a dead cat bounce for Siebold. I haven't been a big critic of him however, I'm not so sure anymore.
It was the perfect win for the Seibold non believers,like me.An absolutely putrid game,very poor opposition who had multiple key players out (more critical than who Manly had absent),same sideways play,a 9 minute 3 try burst that didn’t prove anything and the 2 points to creep them a bit further away from the spoon.Bring on another win like that against Souths
 
It was the perfect win for the Seibold non believers,like me.An absolutely putrid game,very poor opposition who had multiple key players out (more critical than who Manly had absent),same sideways play,a 9 minute 3 try burst that didn’t prove anything and the 2 points to creep them a bit further away from the spoon.Bring on another win like that against Souths
Im certainly not sold on Seibold but in the spirit of fairness it could be argued that we were missing our two starting frontrowers, our star backrower, our starting hooker and our captain could have been playing in a dinner jacket. Granted it was an ugly win but a win nevertheless.
 
Im certainly not sold on Seibold but in the spirit of fairness it could be argued that we were missing our two starting frontrowers, our star backrower, our starting hooker and our captain could have been playing in a dinner jacket. Granted it was an ugly win but a win nevertheless.
Tigers had more important players out and having Croker out is a positive for Manly.And it was the Tigers,after all
 
Personally, I think he's probably a really nice bloke, but I don't like him as our coach because he's too mentally stable. We need some kind of imbalanced nut like Bellamy, Ricky or Des in his prime. Swearing and having a sideways frozen mouth, gum chewing and acting like a ten year old on the sidelines, ripping doors off hinges, imo, mindset of premiership coaches. Toovey blowing a gasket for his team.
But then, the spanner in the works is Cleary, totally in control and measured. Four titles in a row..
Either Cleary or a basket case, not Siebs.
 
I'm just stunned that he thinks he is entitled to be involved in a succession plan wtf? This is not a great of our club he should be thankful he got an extension and concentrate on coaching and let others worry about our next coach.
The minute he put a date on his planned coaching exit we should have said thanks for your service bye.
 
I'm just stunned that he thinks he is entitled to be involved in a succession plan wtf? This is not a great of our club he should be thankful he got an extension and concentrate on coaching and let others worry about our next coach.
The minute he put a date on his planned coaching exit we should have said thanks for your service bye.
I’m not 100% sure he specifically said he wants that role at Manly,but I agree,if he did,he should of been moved on.And let’s say he did say that,what about the person that’s currently in that position or does that position even exist at Manly and Seibold and his slimy manager are just creating a job for him
 
I’m not 100% sure he specifically said he wants that role at Manly,but I agree,if he did,he should of been moved on.And let’s say he did say that,what about the person that’s currently in that position or does that position even exist at Manly and Seibold and his slimy manager are just creating a job for him

Yeah even if he didn't want the job why would his input be needed for a new coach? Just do your job
 
Sack this fool!

last night was laughable even tho we won

Plodell - Please

Matt Dodge - please
Soup, I’m surprised you’re here after a win, usually you are in hibernation. Lodge did well to open the game. Waddell, well we can all agree he isn’t 1st grade standard in the back row. To sack a coach after a win is ridiculous, at least wait until we lose mate & most will agree lol
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 16 13 0 3 104 28
2 Bulldogs 14 11 0 3 96 28
3 Storm 13 9 0 4 172 24
4 Warriors 14 10 0 4 25 24
5 Roosters 14 7 0 7 16 20
6 Panthers 15 7 1 7 3 19
7 Broncos 14 7 0 7 50 18
8 Sea Eagles 15 7 0 8 40 18
9 Sharks 15 8 0 7 20 18
10 Dolphins 15 7 0 8 140 16
11 Dragons 13 5 0 8 -59 16
12 Cowboys 14 5 1 8 -140 15
13 Knights 16 6 0 10 -67 14
14 Tigers 15 5 0 10 -84 14
15 Rabbitohs 15 6 0 9 -89 14
16 Eels 14 5 0 9 -89 14
17 Titans 14 4 0 10 -138 12
Back
Top Bottom