All we are saying, is Pearce off !

[Jigzkiller]

We are definately favourites at this stage

Inside info?

 

[BoomStickBarbie]

Pearce in our time?

 

[Blucky]

Pearce off, Pearce off, Pearce offering I bring

 

[The '47ers]

Pearce de resistance?

 

[globaleagle]

It's rude to brb GE...

Is it? I'll just ring Mitchell to see if you're telling the truth.

br.... er, um, this is awkward.

 

[manlyfan76]

Better to be Pearced off than Pearced on.

 

[Mals]

Inside info?

Overheard it in a cafe in Dee Why...

 

[HappilyManly]

To digress - this thread now has over 60 pages and over 1200 posts.

As per unwritten silvertails rules it needs to be renamed using Pearce as a Pun.

@BoomStickBarbie

Junior Journal

Pearce played 5/8 in SOO to Hodkos 7 and the Blues won it that year

Should complement Chez well

 

[Ralphie]

Junior Journal

Pearce played 5/8 in SOO to Hodkos 7 and the Blues won it that year

Should complement Chez well

Nah, Pearce hasn't won a SOO.

 

[Denno]

Nah, Pearce hasn't won a SOO.

Reynolds & Hodos were the 1/2 s
when they won..... Pearce ...suspended for Hound Humping

 

[HappilyManly]

Nah, Pearce hasn't won a SOO.

True, but he was happy at 5/8

 

[EagleFlys]

Don't call me Junior

 

[Bearfax]

I've been trying to make sense of Supreme Leaders comments and inside info suggesting Pearce is coming to Manly. Given clubs are forbidden to negotiate with a player contracted more than 12 months ahead (that's why Green was no problem, only had to end of '18 left on contract), I thought it unlikely Manly would risk losing their chance at snaring the half back. So, if SL's informer is on the money, how could such an arrangement been made.

The way around it I can see is if someone not employed by the Sea Eagles goes off and interviews Pearce in Hawaii and seeks to encourage the half back to join Manly, then this is not in breach of the rules. As long as Manly's involvement is held at arms length, such negotiations would be quite legit. At that point a verbal agreement may have been made, but the again if they were very sneaky an undated agreement could be signed with an understanding that he comes to Manly if the Roosters let him go.

Just a thought

 

[The Who]

I've been trying to make sense of Supreme Leaders comments and inside info suggesting Pearce is coming to Manly. Given clubs are forbidden to negotiate with a player contracted more than 12 months ahead (that's why Green was no problem, only had to end of '18 left on contract), I thought it unlikely Manly would risk losing their chance at snaring the half back. So, if SL's informer is on the money, how could such an arrangement been made.

The way around it I can see is if someone not employed by the Sea Eagles goes off and interviews Pearce in Hawaii and seeks to encourage the half back to join Manly, then this is not in breach of the rules. As long as Manly's involvement is held at arms length, such negotiations would be quite legit. At that point a verbal agreement may have been made, but the again if they were very sneaky an undated agreement could be signed with an understanding that he comes to Manly if the Roosters let him go.

Just a thought

Since when do clubs follow the rules?

 

[Kevinward777]

I've been trying to make sense of Supreme Leaders comments and inside info suggesting Pearce is coming to Manly. Given clubs are forbidden to negotiate with a player contracted more than 12 months ahead (that's why Green was no problem, only had to end of '18 left on contract), I thought it unlikely Manly would risk losing their chance at snaring the half back. So, if SL's informer is on the money, how could such an arrangement been made.

The way around it I can see is if someone not employed by the Sea Eagles goes off and interviews Pearce in Hawaii and seeks to encourage the half back to join Manly, then this is not in breach of the rules. As long as Manly's involvement is held at arms length, such negotiations would be quite legit. At that point a verbal agreement may have been made, but the again if they were very sneaky an undated agreement could be signed with an understanding that he comes to Manly if the Roosters let him go.

Just a thought

Yeah, it does appear a tad on the unlikely side.

 

[Deleted member 26876]

And you know this how?

The one about his preference to not go to newcastle is in about every fox sports article regarding Pearce's potential club, and there was one mentioning he wanted to stay in sydney for his family's sake (and prefers it), thus putting us in the box seat

 

[nightster]

I've been trying to make sense of Supreme Leaders comments and inside info suggesting Pearce is coming to Manly. Given clubs are forbidden to negotiate with a player contracted more than 12 months ahead (that's why Green was no problem, only had to end of '18 left on contract), I thought it unlikely Manly would risk losing their chance at snaring the half back. So, if SL's informer is on the money, how could such an arrangement been made.

The way around it I can see is if someone not employed by the Sea Eagles goes off and interviews Pearce in Hawaii and seeks to encourage the half back to join Manly, then this is not in breach of the rules. As long as Manly's involvement is held at arms length, such negotiations would be quite legit. At that point a verbal agreement may have been made, but the again if they were very sneaky an undated agreement could be signed with an understanding that he comes to Manly if the Roosters let him go.

Just a thought

was Bozo recently in Hawaii?

 

[desreturnoftheking]

We all know Pearce has been an abject failure when it comes to Origin for NSW, but in club football he is a different player and as we know all too well, he has won an NRL premiership as a halfback.

Its actually been his club form that saw him constantly in the NSW team (that and for the past decade there has really been no one other than Hodko who's knees made sure his time at the top was short and sweet).

As to who would play where? The #6 and #7 are so interchangeable these days that it really doesn't matter.[/QUOTE
Mitchell Pearce a premiership winning half back you say that is blossoming complete and utter blasphemy I expect 10 our Fathers 503 Eagle Rocks

Reynolds & Hodos were the 1/2 s
when they won..... Pearce ...suspended for Hound Humping

Nah it was the yellow dress woman wasnt it

 

[Jigzkiller]

True, but he was happy at 5/8

Plenty of players are happy to play out of position in rep footy not so much in club land.

 

[Shoe1]

I've been trying to make sense of Supreme Leaders comments and inside info suggesting Pearce is coming to Manly. Given clubs are forbidden to negotiate with a player contracted more than 12 months ahead (that's why Green was no problem, only had to end of '18 left on contract), I thought it unlikely Manly would risk losing their chance at snaring the half back. So, if SL's informer is on the money, how could such an arrangement been made.

The way around it I can see is if someone not employed by the Sea Eagles goes off and interviews Pearce in Hawaii and seeks to encourage the half back to join Manly, then this is not in breach of the rules. As long as Manly's involvement is held at arms length, such negotiations would be quite legit. At that point a verbal agreement may have been made, but the again if they were very sneaky an undated agreement could be signed with an understanding that he comes to Manly if the Roosters let him go.

Just a thought

Both supreme leader and snake have inside info. Snake is leaking the party line that has to be adhered to.