Is it possible we have players coming who will play finals and there'll be no announcement until their current team is out?My concern is , to date , everything we know ( or hear ) is one way ……OUT!!
Maybe?
Yeah.
No.
Probably not.
Is it possible we have players coming who will play finals and there'll be no announcement until their current team is out?My concern is , to date , everything we know ( or hear ) is one way ……OUT!!
Even a half decent replacement would doAgree, they wouldn’t let Parker go without a decent replacement.
That’s a good point , I doubt it but you could be right.Is it possible we have players coming who will play finals and there'll be no announcement until their current team is out?
Maybe?
Yeah.
No.
Probably not.
Lots of outs , and if the rumours are true quite a few more.Even a half decent replacement would do
I am excitedLots of outs , and if the rumours are true quite a few more.
And really just 1 incoming !!!
Don’t know about you but I’m really starting to get worried for next season.
well that could become an option in Klemma 's case and the knights pay a bit of his freight . doubt that that would also include Best. Klemma , Alioia Jake and Paseka as prop rotation or Jake at 13 and Keppie or Boyle as options . if Garrick and Parker leave , could be more then a possibility with klemmer . Actually would be very encouraged with that Klemmer ; Jake , Alioia Paseka prop rotation , Schuster at 13 , Weekes at 6 [ that a bit less likely but will have to accommodate him somehow if Manly want to keep him ]Parker wouldn't be allowed to leave without a replacement you wouldn't think. I reckon Bradman best will be here next year. I also reckon Garrick will be at the knights in a player swap with someone other than best. Maybe a Klemmer. I could be wrong though
Let's say if we gave them Garrick, who hypothetically is on 300k for klemmer 700k. Knights want him as a fullback and want to sign him for 700k. They would have to offer someone up for us to budge. Otherwise what would be the point. Hypothetically if knights wanted to swap klemmer.. we could get him for 400k the first year which would make the transaction even and square dollar wise. But I reckon given the importance of a fullback in the kinghts plans.. we could potentially get klemmer for 300k. But I guess it all really depends on what klemmer would want or demand beyond that 1 yearwell that could become an option in Klemma 's case and the knights pay a bit of his freight . doubt that that would also include Best. Klemma , Alioia Jake and Paseka as prop rotation or Jake at 13 and Keppie or Boyle as options . if Garrick and Parker leave , could be more then a possibility with klemmer . Actually would be very encouraged with that Klemmer ; Jake , Alioia Paseka prop rotation , Schuster at 13 , Weekes at 6 [ that a bit less likely but will have to accommodate him somehow if Manly want to keep him ]
I agree. Who would be our second string goal kicker after DCE? Can Weekes goal kick?I absolutely love Garrick but I think if there’s a chance to get Best AND Klemmer in exchange then we should probably do it.
No. But Humphreys can.I agree. Who would be our second string goal kicker after DCE? Can Weekes goal kick?
I actually share your optimism, Isz, with all this agitation and supposed movement happening. I have two concerns/questions around the change...I am excited
Everyone wants change and it is clear that there will be some significant roster change next year. No matter what way you look at it
1. You need 30 players for your top squad
2. Contracts mean nothing in the NRL which means almost every player is available
3. There has to be some cap space, especially with the forecasted increase...even accounting for DCE and the T's.
My hope is that we are heading to a 1993/94 season next year - for the kids that was when Bozo (not the meme poster but the coach) came back to coach and brought through a generation of young kids like Beaver, Kosef, Gartner, Elsegood, Danny Moore, Solomon H etc to play with Des, Tooves and Cliffy
But then again I am what appears to be the only optimist left on here
IStill think Parker would have made a pretty decent backrower...but then I think I'm alone with that idea. Oh well.
Agree but zero chanceIf I'm reading the recruitment speculation correctly, we only seem to get players from the bottom few clubs (ie Tugers and Knights). Our big recruitment in 2022 was Bully who came from the wooden spooners.
Wouldn't it be nice to get a player from Melbourne, Easts or Penrith?
Misadventure? Wow, not so keen on liberal democracy then? I hadn't picked you as a big fan of feudalism BearFrench revolution all over again Sheik? Tens of thousands lost their heads during that misadventure. ..
Misadventure? Wow, not so keen on liberal democracy then? I hadn't picked you as a big fan of feudalism Bear
If they were expecting big things from Weekes then I would have thought they would have played him. Plenty of opportunities to. But I really want him to make it.My guess regarding Parker is that Manly are expecting big things from Tuilaga and Weekes, competing for the centre spot. Be a big mistake f they let Garrick go as he is easily our best wing man and a good goal kicker
If they were expecting big things from Weekes then I would have thought they would have played him. Plenty of opportunities to. But I really want him to make it.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |