Fonz said:Rex said:I'm trying to understand what you're saying susan. You're saying if a player stops and passes the ball backwards out of the hands and it floats forward, then that is not a forward pass.susan said:fonz
im glad you put the rule in black and white.where the ball ends up has nothing to do with it.it is simple-if it comes from the hands flat or backwards it is ok.It has nothing to with Hayne moving or stopping or anything else-from the hands is the only point taht matters.
What I'm trying to understand is how a stationery player passes the ball backwards out of the hands and causes it to go forward. A sudden gust of wind? Players breathing heavily? Curvature of time-space? Or was Isaac Newton wrong?
Have a look at the replays. Hayne was not stationary whilst throwing either ball as others have stated to prove their point. Amateur arguement.
codewana said:Surely the movement of the ball should be governed relative to the ground and not the player?
It's the rule mate. Sorry. As SER8 said, throw an apple out of your car window. Does it float forwards even though you've thrown it backwards codewana?
Daniel said:When you drop a coin inside a car, because of the Coriolis effect it seems to fall straight down to you, but if you looked at it from outside the car it would fall in a curved line.
Fonz said:Mother natures rules don't apply in the NRL.
DSM5 said:. . . he was prancing laterally across the field. .. Hayne was not moving forward.
You forgot the wind resistance Tokyo. The wind resistance! Slows the forward momentum.TokyoEagle said:Sorry to tell you Dan, if you dropped your apple out of a moving car it would fall towards the ground as it was accelerated by gravity, but , it would also continue its forward momentum that it had as a part of the moving vehicle before release.
Fonz said:Rex said:I'm trying to understand what you're saying susan. You're saying if a player stops and passes the ball backwards out of the hands and it floats forward, then that is not a forward pass.susan said:fonz
im glad you put the rule in black and white.where the ball ends up has nothing to do with it.it is simple-if it comes from the hands flat or backwards it is ok.It has nothing to with Hayne moving or stopping or anything else-from the hands is the only point taht matters.
What I'm trying to understand is how a stationery player passes the ball backwards out of the hands and causes it to go forward. A sudden gust of wind? Players breathing heavily? Curvature of time-space? Or was Isaac Newton wrong?
Have a look at the replays. Hayne was not stationary whilst throwing either ball as others have stated to prove their point. Amateur arguement.
Rex said:You forgot the wind resistance Tokyo. The wind resistance! Slows the forward momentum.TokyoEagle said:Sorry to tell you Dan, if you dropped your apple out of a moving car it would fall towards the ground as it was accelerated by gravity, but , it would also continue its forward momentum that it had as a part of the moving vehicle before release.
Has everyone allowed for the wind resistance in Hayne's passes?
Fonz said:Rex said:I'm trying to understand what you're saying susan. You're saying if a player stops and passes the ball backwards out of the hands and it floats forward, then that is not a forward pass.susan said:fonz
im glad you put the rule in black and white.where the ball ends up has nothing to do with it.it is simple-if it comes from the hands flat or backwards it is ok.It has nothing to with Hayne moving or stopping or anything else-from the hands is the only point taht matters.
What I'm trying to understand is how a stationery player passes the ball backwards out of the hands and causes it to go forward. A sudden gust of wind? Players breathing heavily? Curvature of time-space? Or was Isaac Newton wrong?
Have a look at the replays. Hayne was not stationary whilst throwing either ball as others have stated to prove their point. Amateur arguement.
Never said Hayne was stationery with either pass. Amateur challenge.
Fonz said:I wonder how many people would still call it forward if a Manly player threw it?
Fonz said:^^^^^^^ See above. Bout page 5 or 6 jjai
jjai said:Fonz said:^^^^^^^ See above. Bout page 5 or 6 jjai
No Fonz it was a better diagram & explanation then that.. had 4 clips ..
Fonz said:I wonder how many people would still call it forward if a Manly player threw it?
captainskin said:Rex, at least Fonz spelt 'stationary' right ;^)
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | -30 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -9 | 0 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -16 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -38 | 0 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -54 | 0 |