It has to come down to coaching. Not the technical side of coaching (although technically we look crap too) but the psychological side of coaching. Seibold simply can’t galvanise or motivate the team. How else can this piss poor effort be explained? It’s not a lack of talent.Multiple weeks in a row now.... cannot understand why we lack any sort of energy and or enthusiasm.... honestly seems like there is a number of players lacking real desire to win and I am very confused as to why????
i agree that Crocker is just not cutting it, but there is a distinct lack of desire or enthusiasm. It’s there from the opening minute. Today the sharks ran harder, got off their line quicker and tackled harder than we did, from the kick off. That’s about commitment, respect for the jersey and the club, respect for your team mate and a desire to win. We lack every one of those traits right now.I think I have a fair idea…we need a 9 that can help the forwards get over the ad line. We are lucky to make 30m in a set on average. What this does is fatigue everyone because we’re not turning the opposition forwards around or making them work hard to control us…
One could ask why do we seem fatigued early in matches, surely we’re fit? But it’s kinda like going for run and the lactic acid and burning in the lungs hits early before plateauing out. We’re just on the back foot from the get go and the opposition are getting quick play-the-balls. People talk about line speed but you can’t have line speed when you’re still getting back onside at the same time the opposition have cleared the ruck.
We need a 9 and a couple of speedy forwards to help Paseka out. We just don’t have the middle to compete at the moment. That’s why the attack is pedestrian as well. Everything is off slow ruck speed.
You could be right but I reckon the Sharks look like they’re running hard because they are getting the ball over the ad line, running into a back pedalling defence.I
i agree that Crocker is just not cutting it, but there is a distinct lack of desire or enthusiasm. It’s there from the opening minute. Today the sharks ran harder, got off their line quicker and tackled harder than we did, from the kick off. That’s about commitment, respect for the jersey and the club, respect for your team mate and a desire to win. We lack every one of those traits right now.
The fact that Crocker offers very little at dummy half definitely doesn’t help. But it’s so noticeable when you’re at the game and seeing it live, how different the level of energy between the two teams is. I was there and I had one ear listening to the radio and the commentators were saying exactly the same thing. Manly looked extremely flat - sharks look wAy more enthusiastic. How can that be?? How can you play this game (or any professional game)and not bust your arse?? It’s beyond me, and that’s why I just think it comes down to coaching.You could be right but I reckon the Sharks look like they’re running hard because they are getting the ball over the ad line, running into a back pedalling defence.
We get the ball and just have forwards running one out into the teeth of the defence because there is no subtlety around the ruck. We’re sitting ducks.
If it’s not structural, then maybe it’s just that we don’t have enough competitive types in our playing ranks…that or our coach is not a good motivator.
I was at the game too and after the Sharks first try, I was worried we’d get done by 50 because they were tearing through our middle.The fact that Crocker offers very little at dummy half definitely doesn’t help. But it’s so noticeable when you’re at the game and seeing it live, how different the level of energy between the two teams is. I was there and I had one ear listening to the radio and the commentators were saying exactly the same thing. Manly looked extremely flat - sharks look wAy more enthusiastic. How can that be?? How can you play this game (or any professional game)and not bust your arse?? It’s beyond me, and that’s why I just think it comes down to coaching.
Croker is a great competitor and good defender. However, his slow service and lack of running game really stood out today against Brailey who ran at the right times and had his forwards running onto the ball.I think I have a fair idea…we need a 9 that can help the forwards get over the ad line. We are lucky to make 30m in a set on average. What this does is fatigue everyone because we’re not turning the opposition forwards around or making them work hard to control us…
One could ask why do we seem fatigued early in matches, surely we’re fit? But it’s kinda like going for run and the lactic acid and burning in the lungs hits early before plateauing out. We’re just on the back foot from the get go and the opposition are getting quick play-the-balls. People talk about line speed but you can’t have line speed when you’re still getting back onside at the same time the opposition have cleared the ruck.
We need a 9 and a couple of speedy forwards to help Paseka out. We just don’t have the middle to compete at the moment. That’s why the attack is pedestrian as well. Everything is off slow ruck speed.
I don't understand this.... we showed the intensity/will / desire against the storm and haven't shown it since!Because we don't have the troops. I wish all questions are that easy.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 | 19 | 5 | 243 | 44 | |
24 | 17 | 7 | 186 | 40 | |
24 | 16 | 8 | 275 | 38 | |
24 | 16 | 8 | 222 | 38 | |
24 | 15 | 9 | 89 | 36 | |
24 | 14 | 10 | 96 | 34 | |
24 | 13 | 10 | 113 | 33 | |
24 | 12 | 12 | -40 | 30 | |
24 | 12 | 12 | -127 | 30 | |
24 | 11 | 13 | -1 | 28 | |
24 | 11 | 13 | -126 | 28 | |
24 | 10 | 14 | -70 | 26 | |
24 | 9 | 14 | -62 | 25 | |
24 | 8 | 16 | -168 | 22 | |
24 | 7 | 17 | -155 | 20 | |
24 | 7 | 17 | -188 | 20 | |
24 | 6 | 18 | -287 | 18 |