Fluffy said:How much will less the sponsors pay for advertising at Brookie is we only play a few games there a year?
How much more will council need to charge in order to meet the higher fixed costs to games ratio?
How much less will the club make from fans who only want the brookie only membership?
Cambo said:I think the 2 stadiums works for all Sydney teams except manly
1 that 18km (approx) steach of road from brookvale to the city is one of the slowest in Sydney
2 as stated several times public transport to both stadiums is crap.
Brookvale needs to upgraded to a similar standard as gosford that's the bottom line.
WAMF said:I want to see Abbott fulfil his promise of $20mil when we sweep him in to power at the next election and see Brookvale oval receive a total makeover, befitting of a champion team like Manly.
He better stick to his promise.
Daniel said:Not a young ones fan, huh Cambo?
DSM5 said:Who says you'd get 25 K at the SFS for a Melbourne v us game? We played the Cows there in a semi and got about 15K. Brookvale is OK. Just redevelop the corporates if that will do. I don't mind standing.
bones said:Why don't we just wait for an articulated lorry full of cash and everything we we will ever need to coming crashing through the front door and then build our own stadium?
Shoe1 said:Was that in a young ones episode?
WAMF said:Fluffy, why do you really think membership numbers would drop so significantly?
Most will support the club irrespective of where the Sea Eagles play.
If there were improved transport options why wouldn't fans head to the SFS if it became the Sea Eagles home ground?
Cut through the B.S and it's 'upgrade' or 'move' they are the only two outcomes.
The Who said:Also, as I've said before and it hasn't been refuted, the Leagues Club and some businesses surrounding Brookvale that sponsor the Sea Eagles benefit greatly from home matches.
The Who said:WAMF said:Fluffy, why do you really think membership numbers would drop so significantly?
Most will support the club irrespective of where the Sea Eagles play.
If there were improved transport options why wouldn't fans head to the SFS if it became the Sea Eagles home ground?
Cut through the B.S and it's 'upgrade' or 'move' they are the only two outcomes.
WAMF, I'm loving the debate, even though I think you are misguided.
I for one would cut my membership from a 10-game season to a three-game season if matches were moved from Brookvale. I'm prepared to go to the occasional match at the SFS, but it would need to be on a Sunday. I think I am representative of a lot of full member fans.
Also, as I've said before and it hasn't been refuted, the Leagues Club and some businesses surrounding Brookvale that sponsor the Sea Eagles benefit greatly from home matches. Are they going to be compensated for a downturn in trade?
Jono said:unless you experience the weekly trudge of following your team around, experiencing the local transport system (especially on and Monday and Friday night), seeing the number of fans we get out to some of these grounds, the atmosphere at these grounds compared to Brookie, and the fickle support on a weekly basis from the Manly fans RIGHT NOW (not in the past when you may have lived in Sydney), you have no right to a comment in regards to this topic.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |