Turbo tied up long term

[The '47ers]

It should be noted that the NRL don't take to kindly to contract extensions wherein the player has a well known history of medical issues at the time contract negotiations are occurring and then a multi-year deal is agreed too by both the player and the NRL club.

Will they have any problem with Tom's deal then?

 

[The '47ers]

Personally very happy to keep Turbo. The attitude of the Turbos, and loyalty to Manly is an important part of the puzzle to win our next premiership IMO.
I reckon a team full of Jake-attitudes, and we win one.

He's been here 12 freaking years for 0 🤦🏻‍♂️😂

 

[AndWeDon'tCare]

Will they have any problem with Tom's deal then?

That's a great question and I am unable to answer that however, I believe the possible CTE consequences are of more significance, in the longer term than say, hamstring issues.

I don't believe so however, it's Manly, I'm sure the NRL will find something wrong with what we do with our players.

 

[niccipops]

He's been here 12 freaking years for 0 🤦🏻‍♂️😂

Not surrounded by like minded people. We need to build the right team and mindset.

 

[LeonardCohen]

I don’t want Tom’s career to finish yet, so I’m very happy if he stays. I’ve loved watching him play and we need really Manly people around the place to keep our identity. Love it!

 

[Uber Eagle 72]

Happy to hear though not surprised 😜 Tom is staying. Our salary cap will be much stronger from 2027 and beyond.

 

[aidan]

The deal being discussed is a one year option into 2027 however, the issue with his concussions is playing some weight in relation to a duty of care to Jake if he was to continue playing, both by the Club and Jake's own advisors.

It should be noted that the NRL don't take to kindly to contract extensions wherein the player has a well known history of medical issues at the time contract negotiations are occurring and then a multi-year deal is agreed too by both the player and the NRL club.

It leads to the later issue of the NRL potentially declining a medical retirement request on the basis of the medical condition being known at the time the offer is made by a NRL Club.

A majority of NRL clubs are now relying on guidance from the NRL about issues that may arise during the course of a subsequent contract, so in our case, the one year extension is in play to limit the possible exposure, in terms of salary cap "loss", should the club be faced with the possibility of a medical retirement in 2027.

It may happen in 2026 and that would be dealt with under the current contract arrangements.

Appreciate the detail mate, that really puts the contract situation in perspective.

From my point of view, I honestly don’t see how Jake should be going past 2026, let alone 2027 — I’ve said before that his output has already dropped off significantly, and then when you add the concussion risk, it feels like a big ask for him to play on, where the risks almost certainly outweigh the benefits.

Do you think there’s a genuine chance he retires at the end of next season and turns down Manly’s 1-year extension? Or is it more a game-by-game situation at this point, where another concussion would probably mean immediate retirement given his history?

 

[Under the Sticks]

With that length of contract the Captaincy has to be coming his way ahead of his fragile big brother in 2026.

 

[Supreme Leader]

If he stays on the park, then fair money.

 

[Rocky]

I'm glad Tom is staying. But realistically he's played about 4 games this season where he would justify a 850k salary.

 

[Budgie]

The deal being discussed is a one year option into 2027 however, the issue with his concussions is playing some weight in relation to a duty of care to Jake if he was to continue playing, both by the Club and Jake's own advisors.

It should be noted that the NRL don't take to kindly to contract extensions wherein the player has a well known history of medical issues at the time contract negotiations are occurring and then a multi-year deal is agreed too by both the player and the NRL club.

It leads to the later issue of the NRL potentially declining a medical retirement request on the basis of the medical condition being known at the time the offer is made by a NRL Club.

A majority of NRL clubs are now relying on guidance from the NRL about issues that may arise during the course of a subsequent contract, so in our case, the one year extension is in play to limit the possible exposure, in terms of salary cap "loss", should the club be faced with the possibility of a medical retirement in 2027.

It may happen in 2026 and that would be dealt with under the current contract arrangements.

Any idea what’s going on with Croker? I cannot believe he hasn’t retired with all his serious concussions. Seems like utter madness to me

 

[The Insomniac]

Im glad he's made the decision to stay with the club he so obviously loves. I believe he wants to make it up to the club and its fans, for the horror injury toll he's experienced. Not his fault, just bad luck. He & his brothers are loyal, well raised honest hard working people who worship this footy club. Therefore when it's time for Jake, im sure he'll do what's right, and move on to his next challenge.
This loyalty is rare in this day and age. Good luck lads. Looking forward to some great days ahead.

 

[The '47ers]

Any idea what’s going on with Croker? I cannot believe he hasn’t retired with all his serious concussions. Seems like utter madness to me

Might be on a back ended contract 💰

 

[Rosko]

Is this where we come to complain about how we're paying him too much? Or do we use the thread where we complained about how we were letting him go to the UK?

Both - like everyone else 😜

 

[LeonardCohen]

Watching the way he played against Saints was so enjoyable. I love those special competitors that are always scheming around the ball, thinking and looking for opportunities. He’s a true competitor and such a smart footballer. The opposition **** themselves when he is on the team sheet because he’s always capable of destroying someone’s career.