Agree it is pointless picking a reserve forward if he doesn't play sufficient minutes. This doesn't allow your key forwards enough time to recover. This is why we aren't finishing games strongly.
There are games when we don't Evan use our 10 rotations. How can you expect your forwads to compete against a pack that's had more rest. The game is to quick these days.
I hoped that tooves learnt his lesson in the gf against the roosters. They finished way stronger because of the way Robertson used his interchange. There key forwards were rested and on the park for the last 15 mins. We still had double the interchanges left and some tired forwads game lost.
Look at the amount of games we have lost late in the second half.
Hang on a minute, Hasson came on in the last 15 and was fresh and defensively sound.
Both Lui and Leary had a good break in the 2nd half to give them a rest.
Symonds had more game time than had been planned as he came on to replace Matai.
At one stage I noticed we had Willie, Burgess and Ligi on at the same time and they were doing the job.
Surely bench rotation is as much as a formula as a "feel" thing. Do you really think that Green wanted to play Scott for 60mins unless he felt he needed him too?
According to NRL stats our bench played 48mins more than theirs.
They had two 80 min backrowers - and Mat Scott's 60.
I thought we finished the game strongly enough, it was just a desperate Cowboys last hurrah that did the job. Would it have been as badly criticised if it was five minutes earlier?
Taumalolo coming back to match fitness is the key to the Cowboys campaign - that will give them three 80 min forwards if required - and when he's on there's no better running forward in the game.
Depends what thread we read, it's Tooves' fault re bench rotation, Foz's for taking the tackle on the last, Matai for missing the last tackle, Lyon because he couldn't kick 3 from 3 from the sideline, Hasson for...just being Hasson, Hiku for whatever reason or DCE because he didn't play.