Ned
Bencher
Yeah, well for Jake there's no need to.Extrapolated of course.
Yeah, well for Jake there's no need to.Extrapolated of course.
I didn't mind Nate either. I certainly think he tightened up the middle of the ruck when he was on.
Agreed mate. I was under the impression that the move was all because of his wife getting a job in Melbourne. She was born in Melbourne and recently started working down there so naturally Nate would want to follow her there. This is why the move for Nate has happened so suddenly.I thought it was all about his wife getting a job in Melbourne.
@The Who, @wombatgc & @Ned .
Myles has played 10 teams this season from 13.
In those games, he has averaged 34.9 minutes per game.
Stats During that period
X Average Run Metres 83.2 (832 overall metres) or extrapolated to 80 minutes per game: 190 metres a game
X Tackles per game 18.2 (182 tackles) or extrapolated to 80 minutes per game: 42 tackles a game
Therefore, his time on field, is up there with not only us, but the best in the league. Could he play more minutes? Sure. But he is damned effective when playing guys.
Be fair here. I don't see that as plod.
Let us see how the team fares without Myles between now and September ?Do you know how much he is on?
Let's see how the team fares without him between now and September.
I actually thought that Sao was going quite well towards the end of his time with Manly but has been hardly sighted at the Warriors the past two seasons, for whatever reason . It seems to be a bit hit and miss with some recent Kiwi imports , as that lower grade player Eddie Wuff was supposed to be a promising prospect , and i have not noticed him even listed in the 20 's in recent times
I miss having someone in our team we could call SoggyAgreed, I thought Soggy was developing really well but has only run out nine times since Orcland picked him up. Only 24.
Let us see how the team fares without Myles between now and September ?
Are you serious feathered friend ?
So you would rather have Myles on the field in place of young AFB Perrett Darcey ?
Myles is passed it as he has clearly displayed this in the last SOO game. His performance stamped never to play at that level again .
His match impact consistency in his previous years with the Titans and us has been very ordinary . A good game here and there
Myles has been a great player but his time is up.
Myles is like a run down old pick up truck that is due for the wrecking yard
View attachment 5676
Who is Darcy?
FFSFF*Let us see how the team fares without Myles between now and September ?
Are you serious feathered friend ?
So you would rather have Myles on the field in place of young AFB Perrett Darcy ?
Myles is passed it as he has clearly displayed this in the last SOO game. His performance stamped never to play at that level again .
His match impact consistency in his previous years with the Titans and us has been very ordinary . A good game here and there
Myles has been a great player but his time is up.
Myles is like a run down old pick up truck that is due for the wrecking yard
View attachment 5676
The mockery this post has received has already made the point I was going to, but just to be explicit about it:
You don't extrapolate a prop's stats out to 80 minutes. Because they don't play for 80 minutes. They play about half that and they're supposed to deliver high intensity output for half the time. A prop should deliver 100+ metres and 20+ tackles in 40 mins just to get a pass mark.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |