I agree… can’t see Des changing anything. But I do like the idea of Lawton starting on the edge - he did it a lot this year and defended well. Then sub him for Schuster once the game opens up a bit.Des won't be changing anything. But I do agree that Schuster looks cooked.
He's playing a more traditional 2nd rowers role, I'm liking his work tbh. Makes his share of the tough tackles hard to take down, good decoy runner and always seems to make partial breaks and looks to off load if possible. Got a feeling against Sths were going to see him have a break out game, with Schuster putting on a show for us.
Agreed - i flagged this last night in the Haper/Schu/Guaca thread so we are on the same page. Schu replaces Lawton after 30 minutes, then Lawton can have a breather before replacing Froggy for the last 20 minutes.I know, if it ain't broke, don't fix it .... but ..
Schuster has been contained well for the past month, and without any inside knowledge, he just looks tired and frustrated to me .. first full seasons in the NRL can drain young players, added to the bubble effect, and this can possibly be seen as expected ..
I can't help thinking that putting him on the bench ... and injecting him would revitalize him and work well ..Lawton could go back to 2nd row, I was thinking Keppie, but after his performance last night I wouldn't move him for quids.
Why would Dessie fiddle with the starting line-up after last night's great first 10 minutes. This has been where we have been poor for the last half of the season. Our second halves have been bloodbaths for the opposition.
Those that think Walker is returning to the centres full time need to watch the presser where Des says Walker is a utility going forward and he can take it or leave (it) in terms of contract negotiation.
I think Schu is doing fine and if he is there in this years finals for decoy value in attack then that's Des's bsuiness as it seems to be working and his defence is sound. We all know he will evolve into something more, he has too much talent not to and doesn't appear to be lazy just a little off fitness which is different.
fair call. The second row rotation besides injury needs isn't happening based on opposition analysis but the prop rotation certainly is and Dessie got it right last night.I hear what you are saying ... but our great start last night could be seen as a result of fiddling with our starting line up .. the re-birth of Keppie the Rooster Rooter and attitude adjuster to starting prop, and Marty back to the bench ... Schu's role at 2nd row, apart from doing his job, had very little input into our performance ... I agree timing is out for change ... but I do ponder the possibilities ..
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |