Cameron
Make Manly Great Again #Hasler2019
RE: Foran - Will he ? Won't he ?
The smh is correct originally hasler were was the target until they retrieved all the emails then it became evident that Greenberg had induced des. Manly have been sitting on this info for atleast 6 weeks with Tim Unsworth compiling a case.
Now there's a little thing call Tortious Interference you should look that up. I'm no lawyer but someone like Susan might want to elaborate further.
The facts are Once des agreed Todd wanted him from 2011 and indeed promised to cover any costs that des may incurr for walking out on manly, that is inducement.
The funny thing is none of this would of happened if your wonderboy Todd was switched on he could have had des if he had of approached him before July 31st instead of early August. I guess Todd isn't as smart as he thinks.
I'm not the only one on here who's aware of this I'm sure Lovefooty and a few others can tell you the same.
See Todd can deny it and say he didn't send des emails. But look at it like this Mr I, if I send Dan an email about you and He forwards the content to you the information from me stil hits you account. Replace the name Dan with say George and mines Todd, do you get the picture.
Feel free to live in your world of denial Though.
edited 🙂
Let me spell it out for you nice and slowMrInvisible said:From an article you quoted in another thread:Cameron said:1) There are emails alright, emails from Person A to Person B about Person C and so on all retrieved
2) Des Hasler wont be the Target of Legal action
3) The Legal action may not be taken by manly. (read between the lines)
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/eagles-to-obstruct-a-foran-defection-20120421-1xdoz.html#ixzz1sgcRSwX9
Points 2 and 3 straight out the window.The Sun-Herald revealed in February that Manly were considering legal action against Hasler for breach of contract.
Note the words "WERE considering".
Cameron said:* Edited. what part of no abuse is hard to understand? *
Look what pops in to sunday's paper hmmmm.
Toddy can deny it all he wants as i said this may not end up a civil mater
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/legal-eagles-sit-on-damaging-emails/story-e6frexnr-1226335147557
Legal Eagles sit on damaging emails
James Hooper
The Sunday Telegraph
April 22, 2012 12:00AM
THE grudge match between Manly and the Bulldogs always threatened to explode - and right on cue the grenades have been tossed.
The Sea Eagles board have sought legal advice over a series of what they claim are damaging emails incriminating former coach Des Hasler, Bulldogs CEO Todd Greenberg and player agent George Mimis.
Sea Eagles insiders have told The Sunday Telegraph that club solicitor Tim Unsworth is in possession of a trail of emails showing the Bulldogs knowingly induced Hasler into breaking his Manly contract last August - six weeks before the grand final.
Manly also allege Greenberg guaranteed Hasler the Bulldogs would cover his legal costs should the Sea Eagles sue him for damages.
This is something Greenberg strongly refutes.
FINALLY A FACT!!!
Which brings us to the next hot item in the ever-widening chasm between the Bulldogs and the Sea Eagles - the fight to secure the signature of Manly's New Zealand international five-eighth Kieran Foran for next season.
Some Sea Eagles power brokers wanted to use the allegedly damaging emails to stop the Bulldogs' attempts to poach Foran.
The Sea Eagles even discussed as much at the board meeting at Manly Leagues club last month, where it was agreed that chairman Scott Penn should reach out to Bulldogs counterpart Ray Dib for a "sit down".
Manly powerbrokers are privately fuming after Penn did not immediately arrange the meeting with Dib, instead sailing off for a family holiday two weeks ago.
Imagine when Sea Eagles insiders learn what Penn initially told Hasler when confronted about the Bulldogs offering the premiership-winning coach a contract last year? "You should go," Penn told him. ANOTHER FACT??
This development will only further split the fault line that exists inside the Sea Eagles board room.
Logically one can draw a line to that conclusion
At the same time as Penn has been sailing the world and attending a wedding in Las Vegas, Foran let an unofficial deadline to sign with the Sea Eagles lapse two weeks ago and continues to weigh up his options.
WOW hang on, too much fact here, this is work of fiction after all
The longer Foran delays a decision, the more people suspect he's going to join Hasler at Canterbury.
Yes they SUSPECT, much like most of this article
With all due respect to the above quote I just put in it's place, this is the greatest load of dribble I've had the displeasure of reading. Pretty much a trained monkey can write a Daily Telegraph article, because they seem to all come of the same template, with a few blanks filled in.
The key to such articles is to never name your sources and remain as vague as possible to avoid the papers lawyers copping a defamation lawsuit should someone get a bit angry.
According to <insider/powerbroker/officials inside the club/source> <player_name> *insert rumour from internet*. Off to press we go.
I've bolded all the areas of vagueness in this article.
The smh is correct originally hasler were was the target until they retrieved all the emails then it became evident that Greenberg had induced des. Manly have been sitting on this info for atleast 6 weeks with Tim Unsworth compiling a case.
Now there's a little thing call Tortious Interference you should look that up. I'm no lawyer but someone like Susan might want to elaborate further.
The facts are Once des agreed Todd wanted him from 2011 and indeed promised to cover any costs that des may incurr for walking out on manly, that is inducement.
The funny thing is none of this would of happened if your wonderboy Todd was switched on he could have had des if he had of approached him before July 31st instead of early August. I guess Todd isn't as smart as he thinks.
I'm not the only one on here who's aware of this I'm sure Lovefooty and a few others can tell you the same.
See Todd can deny it and say he didn't send des emails. But look at it like this Mr I, if I send Dan an email about you and He forwards the content to you the information from me stil hits you account. Replace the name Dan with say George and mines Todd, do you get the picture.
Feel free to live in your world of denial Though.
edited 🙂