Daly Cherry-Evans deserves to go out on his terms - and Manly have dropped the ball big time
Manly and the club's fans are reeling after Monday's bombshell events.
Andrew Reid
Updated Tue 25 March 2025 at 9:42 am AEDT·4-min read
It's hard to separate fact from fiction in this whole
Daly Cherry-Evans saga and it seems clear that we don't yet know the full story. But one thing that's abundantly clear is Manly ultimately decided they wanted to keep the skipper for another two years, however the club's eleventh-hour offer on live TV was too little, too late. The ship had already sailed and DCE had made up his mind that it was time to move on.
The
Manly captain's revelation that this season would be his last at the club sent shockwaves around the NRL world on Monday. DCE confirmed the news on Nine's '100% Footy' program and revealed the Sea Eagles had still not offered him a new deal at the end of last year, so he decided to cut ties with the club and allow the Sea Eagles to focus on ushering in their next halfback.
DCE denied reports that Manly eventually made him a 'lowball' offer to stay at the club beyond this year, despite suggestions he was seeking a two-year deal. The Manly captain insisted there was no bad blood with the club but if that's entirely true, it begs the question why he "respectfully" turned down the club's late offer of a two-year, $1.5 million extension on Monday night. After all, the two-year deal is seemingly what he was always after.
There have been murmurings of a potential rift with Anthony Seibold due to the fact Cherry-Evans didn't invite the Manly coach to his wedding last year. But even if there was a semblance of truth to those rumours, Cherry-Evans is too smart and too classy to air it publicly and potentially destabilise the club. Reading between the lines though, it does appear like he's decided to move on somewhere else, but you can understand why he wouldn't want to announce that after just three rounds.
This season is DCE's 15th at the club and his commitment to Manly should not be called into question. Few players have worked as hard as the 36-year-old, been better role models on and off the field and delivered such consistent performances over such a long period of time - while staying relatively injury-free. He's only missed 20 games across his entire career and many of them have been because of State of Origin and he holds the record for most appearances for the club.
And that's precisely why Manly were naive to treat Cherry-Evans like any normal 36-year-old player, rather than one of the premier halves in the competition. DCE is still the incumbent Maroons captain and is playing some of the best footy of his career, making Manly's reluctance to initially offer him more than a one-year extension a little hard to believe. They should have done everything in their power to ensure DCE finished his career as a one-club player.
The situation has been
likened to the one that saw Adam Reynolds leave Souths for Brisbane after the Bunnies were only willing to offer the club favourite a one-year extension. But unlike Reynolds, Manly's skipper does not have the injury history and it should have been an easy decision from Sea Eagles officials to hand him a two-year deal, considering his impressive form and influence on the side.
Daly Cherry-Evans wanted what he was worth
I've seen plenty of so-called Manly fans accuse DCE of being greedy and claiming that he should have taken a pay-cut to stay at the club. What an absolute load of crap. Who in their right mind would do that when they're performing their job as well as ever and continue to set the standards for others to follow?
Why should DCE have to accept less money when there are other players at the club on similar or even bigger pay-packets that have less influence on footy games? Cherry-Evans was only seeking what he felt he was entitled to and no one should begrudge him for doing that. And the brutal truth for the Sea Eagles is that a rival club will almost certainly give him what he wants.
The sad thing for Manly is the club only came to the realisation about DCE's worth when it was too late. And it begs the question about how the club's powerbrokers let it get to this point. Rather than pointing the finger of blame at Cherry-Evans, maybe it's time to realise that Manly officials really dropped the ball when it came to the future of their captain and leader.