Don’t go anywhere near Rushcutters Bay asking those questions. You may end up with Uncle Nicks special concrete boots and a boat ride.Taking the SBW example - if NRL contracts are usually based on 12 month years, then extrapolating on SBW being paid $150k for 4 games (essentially 1 month) means if you scale it up to 12 months, his contract was worth $1.8m per annum.
Now, if the Roosters were allowed to "scale down" SBW's 4 game contract & pro-rate it, surely the space left in their cap at the time should also have been pro-rated?
I'd be very interested to know the finer details of the agreement, seeing as the Roosters also flew him & his family back to Australia & put them into (luxurious) hotel quarantine for 2 weeks as well as providing them a car.
What was laughable was the Roosters originally submitted a contract value of $130k but the NRL apparently thought it was too low, so they agreed on $150k - $20k more LOOOOL!!!
I dare you to say that to the new (rooster) wife Dan.If this isn't just media speculation and rubbish then the Roosters make a complete mockery of the salary cap and the league and its absolutely atrocious that the NRL let them get away with it. It's also embarrassing for the NRL
The shrewd point was appointing the salary cap auditor and one of the salary cap architects on the team to manage the cap and financials.It is not ridiculous it is remarkably astute
The moral of the story In regards to the cap and all the rules that are put in place
We have the sheep that follow the rules
And the Shrewd that break the rules
Because Rules are there to be broken by the wise Innovators
Ba Ba Black sheep have you any clue ?
No sir no sir No can do
View attachment 17746
I did last night when I read the article, granted I was fresh back from a long lunchI dare you to say that to the new (rooster) wife Dan.
Wise people always make a mockery of foolsIf this isn't just media speculation and rubbish then the Roosters make a complete mockery of the salary cap and the league and its absolutely atrocious that the NRL let them get away with it. It's also embarrassing for the NRL
I would like to know what suggestions you have that would have changed the following three issues.Perspective time ...
Innovation to the rules has been proved by the Roostes
Cheating has not been proved by the Whingers
Why ? Ask our clubI would like to know what suggestions you have that would have changed the following three issues.
1-Why did the NRL reject our application to medically retire Snake and Matai?
2-Why was our application to sign Glen Stewart on a reduced contract denied.
3-Why did we receive a two year $375k salary cap fine? Considering the FACT, we didn't spend more on players than we should have.
There is a legal process in this country
No feathered friend It does not work that wayYeah sure tell me how you sue the NRL and then have to continue working with them in a situation where they make and arbitrate on the rules.
Even if you win in court you pay in the long run pay back the NRL would be dishing out.
This country is like every other - there are masters and servants and the rules only apply to the servants.
But isn't that merely rules for society?There is a legal process in this country
No feathered friend It does not work that way
Sad if you think it does
Perspective time ...
Innovation to the rules has been proved by the Roostes
Cheating has not been proved by the Whingers
A great Quote by The Great Pablo Picaso ....
LEARN THE RULES LIKE A PRO
SO YOU CAN BREAK THEM LIKE AN ARTIST
View attachment 17748
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |