MrInvisible
Reserve Grader
Thanks for realising that.Utility Player said:From looking at Mr I's posts here and at the kennel he seems to be genuine or is going to a hell of a lot of trouble to deliver a knockout punch.
You then have to ask yourself to what purpose, one inflamatory post will get him banned so we may as well give him the benefit of the doubt as a mate of mine says life is not a dress rehersal so in the scheme of things WGAF.
The way I see it, you can carry on like a pork chop on opposing fans sites, but where does it get you but banned?
If you're there to discuss and see differing opinions then it's something you don't want.
Daniel can nuke my comment (or another mod need be), but this may clarify things a little. Around the whole Desgate saga, I had dropped a few hints and got some pretty solid info fed to me from sources. I can't recall the exact sequence of events, but I informed the mods I had some pretty creditable sources. I was asked after Des made the announcement to please not post on here, simply because it would inflame the situation.
That's why there is a gap in my posting history.
I have contributed to other (non player threads) on here such as the Brookie Oval revamp, etc. I've made it pretty clear that I love old school suburban grounds and that I actually liked Brookie as a stadium.
Sometimes I'm quiet and only appear to post in controversial threads, so it might give off that I'm only here for a dig. Likewise sometimes there are comments I don't feel warrant or need a reply (because it'll open a pandoras box of problems) but I can assure you that I don't post stalk on here, and certain do not post with the intention of inflammation.
If anything I should be thankful most posters are accepting of me here.