Baz could develop Lane as a ball playing second rower like what Seibold has done with John Sutton.
So we've lost our leading try scorer next year why.... Help me understand.
Well young eagly, there's this thing called economics and sometimes it stops us from getting what we want. It's a little like that original AC Cobra you always wanted, we can't afford it. Yeah, I know it sucks, but it's reality.
On a serious note, Parra offered twice the upgraded amount we offered him. I'm guessing they are paying 350k+.
Mate, I reckon throw a 4 in as the first number.
Those pricks love paying crazy overs for Manly players.
Pretty big jump on what we offered him. Would have to say 400k is a lot of money for a second rower just getting into grasps with his game but will be a big loss for us. If we had our full cap, I'd be disappointed but with the salary cap I don't think we had a choice.Agree mate but I wrote 350+ to stave off the "unbelievers". I heard it is 400k and we offered him 200k..
Well I hope we have only offered Sironen half that ,half the defence,half the attack of Lane.Probably quarter the game time to.Pretty big jump on what we offered him. Would have to say 400k is a lot of money for a second rower just getting into grasps with his game but will be a big loss for us. If we had our full cap, I'd be disappointed but with the salary cap I don't think we had a choice.
Based on the little game time he's had, yes he's been disappointing. He has a lot more upside than Lane though. We saw how lethal Graham could be for the Sharks on that left side with his ball playing skills. Sironen could do the same for us. He's also much better as a hole runner or at scoring of grubbers.Well I hope we have only offered Sironen half that ,half the defence,half the attack of Lane.Probably quarter the game time to.
😵ur most overrated player by far.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |