To soften the blow when the owners have the NRL insist that we move away from brookie.Why air this to media ??
This is what I was told weeks ago...and it's an opportunity for the owners to put another 6 or 7 million in their back pockets through relocation money from the NRL.To soften the blow when the owners have the NRL insist that we move away from brookie.
I don't think pre-sold membership counts towards these numbers. That probably goes into the HQ coffers to pay for things around there.Alright guys - lets just show how much bullsh1t is here in very simple maths.
125K per game and we only break even.
Corporate boxes start at 2K per game we have quite a few but lets limit it to 20, that is another 40K per game
right now we are behind 85K per game.
lets say we have an average of just 2000 walk up tickets per game, costing only $20 each
That is 40K
right now we are losing 45K per game.
The cheapest membership is $400 for a family of 4 which gets you 10 games or $10 per game. This is the cheapest way of entering the ground. So lest assume the other 8,000 in our average crowd of only 10,000 are coming through on the cheapest way possible of $10 per game (although in reality it has to be higher given reserved seats are up to $75 per game). So we have 80K from membership.
so already we are making 45K per game using super conservative figures.
Hence this is bullsh1t
Or how about play all 12 at Brookvale and the owner of the club can foot the bill. He is the owner of Manly Sea Eagles, not Central Coast Sea Eagles.Can't ignore the fact that another game has to be taken away from Brookie. Take 2 to Gosford, and 1 to the SFS and theres $300,000 guaranteed.
Alright guys - lets just show how much bullsh1t is here in very simple maths.
125K per game and we only break even.
Corporate boxes start at 2K per game we have quite a few but lets limit it to 20, that is another 40K per game
right now we are behind 85K per game.
lets say we have an average of just 2000 walk up tickets per game, costing only $20 each
That is 40K
right now we are losing 45K per game.
The cheapest membership is $400 for a family of 4 which gets you 10 games or $10 per game. This is the cheapest way of entering the ground. So lest assume the other 8,000 in our average crowd of only 10,000 are coming through on the cheapest way possible of $10 per game (although in reality it has to be higher given reserved seats are up to $75 per game). So we have 80K from membership.
so already we are making 45K per game using super conservative figures.
Hence this is bullsh1t
I don't think pre-sold membership counts towards these numbers. That probably goes into the HQ coffers to pay for things around there.
Come on ,You can't tell me you don't understand why people are getting pissy .Really ?I don't know why anyone is getting pissy about this - they ran the same story about why the Dogs playing at Belmore doesn't work just the other week. They pack Belmore and break even. It's the same for all clubs playing at suburban grounds. The numbers just don't add up.
This isn't really about moving to Gosford as much as it is just painting the picture that a ground like Brookvale with it's current arrangement is uneconomical for a full slate of home games. And further to that - where do you even make up the money? Maybe here - screen hire, entertainment, production ($20,000). That is ****ing ridiculous for what they provide. Someone somewhere is skimming the fat big time. Partly the council - but who else?
There is a point with this where the owner says enough is enough as far as losing money goes. And we as fans cannot expect them to just continually piss money away for eternity just to play at Brookvale. If you do then you are a bigger idiot than the fat **** Zorba. Something needs to give if you want the club on the whole to survive in the long term. Gosford only works for the ground - there is no corporate money up there. It's a wasteland. Homebush probably carries the same positive metrics in terms of money but you lose atmosphere and become a bit of a non entity fan wise.
The reality is probably something like 8 games at Brookvale (on a re-negotiated fee), 2 at Gosford, 1 bush and one major stadium game utilising Easter show or long weekend double header crowds.
When the article actually says:Come on ,You can't tell me you don't understand why people are getting pissy .Really ?
Do you want to lose Brookie ? I know I don't !!
See my post a little bit up...It's easy to get angry at the Penn's, but we'd all have a different opinion if it was our $125,000. I am pretty sure they would like to stay at Brookie and play with better facilities, but as it stands, the council and the state and federal governments can't get their act together to make it happen. Therefore, we keep playing out of sub-par facilities and pay through the nose to do so.
This is being aired to put more pressure on the various parties to make the redevelopment a realisation and/or negotiate a better commercial deal to use the ground.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |