Lol back to the future we go, going after an old Manly rookie who hasn't done anything since his first game (that I can remember anyway), and the 2006 rookie of the year Blakey
Loving the future
NYEagle
I think he is a very good footballer and anyone that thinks otherwise has not watched closely enough, however he is very injury prone and it's just too big a risk in my opinion.
In saying that, i'd take anyone over Williame! I am not buying into the hype. He has improved, but he is still average and I can't see anything that tells me he will be anything but average. Getting run down by a prop from behind is not good enough. I know Wicks is one of the quicker props but still he hardly a speedster.
Is he a winger or centre ?We have brad parker coming through. Bye 2018 he will be top draw.
Was it me or did he look injured making that break?
Come on do not bring logic into a witch hunt. He was chased down by a front rower (ignore he looked injured, the front rower is known to be one of the fastest over a short distance) so we need to burn him nowNot just you - he actually did go down grabbing at his hamstring after he was tackled, and he didn't look to be striding out fully after the initial ankle tap. Haven't heard anything about it since, so hopefully it was just a cramp or muscle spasm.
Agreed. Two or three strides in it locked like he had done a hammy.Was it me or did he look injured making that break?
There are no excuses...he played the remainder of the game so it wasn't a tear or anything...I can't think of too many other young outside backs that wouldn't have scored in that situation...even Wicks mentioned last week that he isn't the same player that scored that try against the Roosters years ago because the years have caught up with him...we could have iced the game if Hex had pace like all good outside backs should. He was also burned badly for pace by Burgess against Souths two weeks ago.Come on do not bring logic into a witch hunt. He was chased down by a front rower (ignore he looked injured, the front rower is known to be one of the fastest over a short distance) so we need to burn him now
There are no excuses...he played the remainder of the game so it wasn't a tear or anything...I can't think of too many other young outside backs that wouldn't have scored in that situation...even Wicks mentioned last week that he isn't the same player that scored that try against the Roosters years ago because the years have caught up with him...we could have iced the game if Hex had pace like all good outside backs should. He was also burned badly for pace by Burgess against Souths two weeks ago.
In the 9's he looked quite quick but he is deceptively slow. If he had other attributes I would cut him some slack but he is just an average fringe first grader IMO.
I will go ahead. I never said u couldn't accept it, but I'm not!Ok, I'm guessing you've never had that kind of cramp or muscle spasm then, where you pull up lame but it's fine after you walk or stretch it out? You see it happen all the time on the field, especially towards the end of games - it also doesn't feel all that different from waking up with a calf cramp in the middle of the night. Bloody excruciating, and you can't extend your leg or walk on it for a minute or two, but as soon as you get it stretched out it's all back to normal.
Sh*t happens - if you want to compare him to all the other 'young outside backs', then get them all to run a sprint test with a cramp or twinge in the hammy and see how they go. It was as plain as the eyes on your face that he wasn't running at full speed on the night, because something wasn't quite right with the leg.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 4 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | -30 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -8 | 0 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -16 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -30 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -38 | 0 |