I am speaking general to the way you worded your comment... im not the one with the agenda here. To your point I said ALL players have strengths and weaknesses and they get debated time to time or have you never paid attention to this forum? I didn't say Saab doesn't have weaknesses. The coach will be the judge on when someone's weakness outweighs his value not me or you. But if youre asking my opinion which I never gave earlier, I think he is pretty safe of late, Jake gives away more 6 agains than anyone which can be argued puts more pressure on the team than any other individual player does hence tiring the team which can lead to others producing handling errors its all relative... when should it be debated about Jakes place on the team? I still wouldnt drop him or Saab or maybe you prefer Jorge back.
Puerile - A childish, infantile imagination apparently.hmm so it my own mind players have strengths and weaknesses which get debated time to time lol - i must have some imagination
A heavy weights program over the off season might help him in this area. He has the potential to be one of the best wingers in the comp given some time to developSaab is definitely not the complete player.
He is fast and pretty good under the high ball. That's about it.
We need more out of yardage from him and when To'o starts shredding teams in the finals, this will really stand out. We also need him to display more urgency at times. Most of his running is straight line stuff too. Yesterday showed that his lateral movements are not fantastic.
I hope he keeps improving.
I agree with Woodsie that there are a few flaws in his game but he is only young and the sky is the limit of improvement for our high flying Sea eagleI like Saab, but understand Woodsie's thoughts completely
He has some ordinary parts in his game that can hopefully improve with experience, toughness and size...and think he will be a top flight NRL winger when he does, but a way off atm,
Saab is a great target for Manly in attack....but unfortunately, he is also a great target for the opposition im defence...
Still not a much better feeling than Saab in space, where it's "shut the gates, the horse has bolted"
Yeah it's nice to have someone on the field that can turn those half chances into tries. I love that about him. We shift wide and if gets into space, he is quick enough to position his support for a try. In the past, we run downfield, get tackled and have to work for another opportunity.I like Saab, but understand Woodsie's thoughts completely
He has some ordinary parts in his game that can hopefully improve with experience, toughness and size...and think he will be a top flight NRL winger when he does, but a way off atm,
Saab is a great target for Manly in attack....but unfortunately, he is also a great target for the opposition im defence...
Still not a much better feeling than Saab in space, where it's "shut the gates, the horse has bolted"
Yeah it's nice to have someone on the field that can turn those half chances into tries. I love that about him. We shift wide and if gets into space, he is quick enough to position his support for a try. In the past, we run downfield, get tackled and have to work for another opportunity.
Saab is a lot like Tupou used to be for the Roosters.
Tupou wasnt great either, but he helped the Roosters win a GF by playing to his strengths and his team knew how to make that happen.
Saab might just be that player we need that beats his man in the GF and wins us the game.
Team him up with the Lawman, he knows how to build a body.A heavy weights program over the off season might help him in this area.
Agreed, the "gun" centres aren't scoring lots of tries or try assists but OUR wingers are scoring PLENTY of tries. The wingers outside of the "gun" centres are not top try-scorers.It also means we don’t need a gun centre
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |