Blake said:So if he was to be granted an immediate release, wouldnt that mean his opposition this weekend would be...Manly?
That woud be classic!!
But fair dinkum what a joke
Blake said:So if he was to be granted an immediate release, wouldnt that mean his opposition this weekend would be...Manly?
Berkeley_Eagle said:Be f**king crazy to let him go to the Chooks for the rest of this year, what the hell is wrong with these players
HappilyManly said:globaleagle said:Found out last night that Parra paid $450k for Darcy - Manly were sane enough not to match it .
Is that per season HM, or is it as BD says and is over 3? If its over 3 then surely we were in the ballpark, or are you taking the piss BD?
Clint said:HappilyManly said:globaleagle said:Found out last night that Parra paid $450k for Darcy - Manly were sane enough not to match it .
Is that per season HM, or is it as BD says and is over 3? If its over 3 then surely we were in the ballpark, or are you taking the piss BD?
Is that a serious question?
do you think he would go from never being a starter in his whole 20 game nrl career, to earning more money than any other player in the manly pack.
If the 450k is accurate it would be $150 a year.
The Who said:Why do clubs target our wingers? We've lost Hoppa Jnr, Robbo, now Whare and Oldfield. Leaves us very short with only one class winger, Wolfie.
Taufa is not a winger but could make a useful lock.
What are our wingers like in NSW Cup?
bob dylan said:Clint said:HappilyManly said:globaleagle said:Found out last night that Parra paid $450k for Darcy - Manly were sane enough not to match it .
Is that per season HM, or is it as BD says and is over 3? If its over 3 then surely we were in the ballpark, or are you taking the piss BD?
Is that a serious question?
do you think he would go from never being a starter in his whole 20 game nrl career, to earning more money than any other player in the manly pack.
If the 450k is accurate it would be $150 a year.
absolutely BD. As The Who said, surely he didn't go for $150k per season. I would like to think an offer from us would at least match that, and Parra do have a history of paying ridiculous overs just to get players to go there.
lloydy said:I wouldn't think so now Rhino.
Crusher_Cleal said:That i crzy mony for Lussick! (if true) Couldn't we give the Rosters Taufua instead?...crikey our outside backs depth is threa-thin bare now..
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 24 | 19 | 0 | 5 | 148 | 44 |
2 | Storm | 24 | 17 | 0 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
3 | Bulldogs | 24 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 120 | 38 |
4 | Broncos | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
5 | Sharks | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 109 | 36 |
6 | Warriors | 24 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 21 | 34 |
7 | Panthers | 24 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 107 | 33 |
8 | Roosters | 24 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 132 | 32 |
9 | Dolphins | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 125 | 30 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 21 | 30 |
11 | Eels | 24 | 10 | 0 | 14 | -76 | 26 |
12 | Cowboys | 24 | 9 | 1 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
13 | Tigers | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -135 | 24 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -181 | 24 |
15 | Dragons | 24 | 8 | 0 | 16 | -130 | 22 |
16 | Titans | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -199 | 18 |
17 | Knights | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -300 | 18 |