I answered a few posts about dce ( not starting them ) on a saab thread. But because it went against the tide its an issue. The original comments were ok it seems
If you cant talk about the previous post then whats the point
Why do people keep saying dce is the best when clearly he isn't
Why do people keep saying dce is the best when clearly he isn't
Why do people keep saying dce is the best when clearly he isn't
This is an original thought , that gets posted deluxe. Nothing to see here. Maybe im part of lifes balance
I make my choices like everybody else. . But when i disagree with a comment i always try to add footy relevent issues to my point. To do anything other would be in my view an unreasonable . I now see this is an issue
I understand my view upsets people and as for it derailing conversations and using the off topic excuse, wow that really lacks intodgrity. Like what topic ever stays on track . Faaaaark me . But this is the level of protectiveness displayed when backing the man not afforded the opposite view it seems
But i will tow the line, because saab will benefit from playing in a backline that has a superior kicking game.
Is that cool ?