OK after a pause to digest all the initial shock & outrage, I just took a second look at the ad and here's an alternate take on a couple of points.
One: the NRL didn't introduce politics into sport. The politics was already there, smack bang in everyone's face.
Two: yes there is a political message underpinning the marketing strategy evident in this ad. But equally a political message underpins the alternative marketing strategy some would prefer. The question is not shall we have a marketing strategy, rather, which marketing strategy? Similarly, it is not a case of will we have a political position, but rather, what is our political position?
Blind Freddy can see the big issues that have surfaced in recent times. Against an international backdrop of 'Me too' we've seen the game drawn into serious criminal allegations against the likes of Hayne, Debelin and Sinclair and numerous other alleged female victims of Walker, May, Bolton, Fainu, Barba, Sivo, etc. The culture of disrespecting females has had a bright light shone upon it and the game has had little choice but to acknowledge (belatedly) that yes there might be a problem.
The anthem? This goes well beyond league and beyond sport. Greenberg and the NRL didn't make this issue up. And it is not only the unpopular Mitchell and Cody Walker, but also the highly popular Addo-Carr too. It is very much a wider community issue that has been made a rugby league issue by some of the biggest stars in the game. DCE spoke about it on NRL just a couple of days ago.
As for the gay issue, a certain ex-Storm ex-Bronco and current ESL player has sparked a debate transcending any single code of footy, and on both sides of the world. Greenberg and the NRL did not make that one up either.
If the NRL had taken the alternative approach and made no reference to those hot topics, don’t be mistaken into thinking that would be apolitical, because it would not. It would actively reflect a political position that says 'all is fine in the world and our rugby league world: everything is in its natural order, we have great tries and big hits but nothing else is going on here folks, certainly no social unrest affecting our game. And especially no challenge to decades of culture widely perceived (outside the game and but also increasingly acknowledged within the game) to incorporate aspects of misogyny, racism and homophobia.
It seems the NRL has chosen not to ignore the social issues causing such angst but instead to take a clear position, namely: rugby league won't condone anti-women attitudes and behaviour, and won't tolerate racism or gay bashing. To me that implies an acknowledgement that there are cultural issues in the game, but they are no longer to be swept under the matt, because the game commits to be a positive and safe place for boys and girls going forward, both as fans and participants.
So, is it a genuine commitment, or just a marketing ploy? That to me is the real question, rather than whether they should have dared to express that idea!