[moved] Candy Cane deleted from MSE Forum
- Thread starter candy
- Start date
Candy to be honest you're one of the most thought provoking posters on ME and I cant see why you are now "N/A".
It seems like common courtesy has gone out the window. Oh well, AE will be happy to see more fine contributions from yourself.
I doubt you were deleted because of anything you typedon AE.
It seems like common courtesy has gone out the window. Oh well, AE will be happy to see more fine contributions from yourself.
I doubt you were deleted because of anything you typedon AE.
Matabele
Journey Man
As I've mentioned before, I've seen some of the "thanks Zorba, only Manly does this Zorba" brigade go on with some disgraceful stuff in the General Forum.
Things like:
1. Advocating paedophilia; and
2. Treatment of new women posters to the site in such a way that they would be facing action for sexual harrasment should it happen in the workplace.
Yet their post count climbs unabated.
Candy makes her point well. The people like me, c-eagle and Candy are amongst the most passionate of supporters, but we agitate for change and improvement. It seems as though there are some who are not robust enough to handle this.
It's very unprofessional and an idictment on senior management that it is allowed to go on, apparently unabated.
If MSE is the "public face" of Manly, the pettyness and small mindedness of the management that is involved in it is by far the largest disgrace upon the club's name - far worse than anything I (and fellow cohorts) have posted there in the past.
Things like:
1. Advocating paedophilia; and
2. Treatment of new women posters to the site in such a way that they would be facing action for sexual harrasment should it happen in the workplace.
Yet their post count climbs unabated.
Candy makes her point well. The people like me, c-eagle and Candy are amongst the most passionate of supporters, but we agitate for change and improvement. It seems as though there are some who are not robust enough to handle this.
It's very unprofessional and an idictment on senior management that it is allowed to go on, apparently unabated.
If MSE is the "public face" of Manly, the pettyness and small mindedness of the management that is involved in it is by far the largest disgrace upon the club's name - far worse than anything I (and fellow cohorts) have posted there in the past.
fLIP
UFO Hunter
Candy, perhaps it would have been more appropriate to spend your time in the MSE forum kissing managment ass than talking about football. It seems to be the only way to cement your place on the site.
I like to throw in the occasional "Thanks for the update Media", "Your the man Zorba" and "How good was Monaghan's game, in a beaten side he stood out".
That seems to keep me well in side the ranks of Mediocrity.
I like to throw in the occasional "Thanks for the update Media", "Your the man Zorba" and "How good was Monaghan's game, in a beaten side he stood out".
That seems to keep me well in side the ranks of Mediocrity.
Thanks, Byso, Fluffy, Mata & fLip. Buttering up is no defence, fLip. I signed the thank you Max threads and on the very day I was banned I contributed to the happy birthday, Zorba thread:
"Happy birthday. Hope you get something really special for your birthday Zorba - Orford's signature would be quite nice". I wasn't trying to butter anyone up - I didn't think I could possibly be at risk - I was just trying to be part of a community that supports each other.
Maybe its Phillip Dean that you need to butter up if you want to stay on the forum.
Still a great mystery to me why I was singled out (with Jules and Binga). Sex discrimination based on my posting name? Maybe its random deletions to unnerve the masses and keep them in line. Didn't think I'd crossed any lines - although it can be a tad difficult to know if you're crossing invisible lines. I thought my postings were insipid compared to some who continue posting.
Byso, I appreciate your posting on MSE- but if you want to keep posting there be careful, mate, because my reading of the situation is that whoever instigated these deletions won't hesitate to do the same again without good reason, warning or advice.
What I don't understand, Byso, is if it can be identified what it takes to be banned on MSE, why don't they just make this explicit so everyone know the rules of the game that MSE Admin wants to play by. Doesn't sound complex to me. No second-guessing required then. Or is a megalomaniac is in charge?
If your theory on the media release is accurate, Byso, then this would be a worry because:
1. I didn't interpret what the media release said, only what it didn't say - I only pointed out that some of the conclusions being drawn on what Monas said were not supported based on what was actually quoted.
2. What I said about the media release was said on this website by "Candy", not on the MSE website by "Candy Cane".
3. Prior to my banishment, no-one (apart from me) knew for sure whether "Candy" and "Candy Cane" were the same person. Maybe you still don't. If you're right Byso, and I felt mischievous, I could get innocent people on MSE banned by "inappropriate" postings on this website (by matching the name of the person I wanted banned).
I was in shock that I survived
Have had the head under the radar 90% of the time though lately
Have had the head under the radar 90% of the time though lately
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 4 |
|
2 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 4 |
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 2 |
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 2 |
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 2 |
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 |
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 0 |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | -8 | 0 |
|
2 | 0 | 2 | -16 | 0 |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | -22 | 0 |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | -30 | 0 |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | -36 | 0 |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | -38 | 0 |