Mid Year Test - England v Kiwis

HappilyManly

Journey Man
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/s...d/news-story/4292dbab0929c9743c3ec9cb2b9e4395

This is bad news for Manly.
If Taupau and AFB are injured, 2018 is over.@:cool:

Hard to believe that Club contracts do not require a player to seek permission from their employer to play for another team :wondering:
----------
NRL, RLPA send letter to NZRL claiming Denver Test is ‘deeply flawed’
MICHAEL CARAYANNIS, The Daily Telegraph
April 6, 2018 8:00pm

A DEFIANT New Zealand Rugby League insists the Denver Test match will go ahead despite receiving a joint letter from the NRL, clubs and the RLPA where the match was described as “deeply flawed”.

The NZRL fired a shot back after receiving the letter co-signed by NRL club boss Todd Greenberg, head of the RLPA Ian Prendergast and South Sydney chief executive Blake Solly.

The Saturday Telegraph has obtained the letter which was sent to all clubs on Friday.



149bbf04a8bc3cbb90200ee2d1b9493b

a835506d5938d92f67d7f0b293504fb3

Letter sent to the NZRL by the NRL and RLPA


The letter — which was sent to the respective bosses of the New Zealand Rugby League and their English counterparts — read the groups were “concerned that the commercial considerations that have motivated (New Zealand and England) to schedule the match may have unreasonably prevailed over a considered and balanced assessment of the risks to the health and safety of NRL players who will play in the match, the disruption that may be caused to the NRL clubs resulting from (potential) player unavailability, and the possible financial risk that NRL clubs may have to assume because of NRL player contract security.

“That the commercial considerations to schedule the match may have unreasonably prevailed over a considered and balanced assessment of the risks to the health and safety of NRL players who will play in the match, the disruption that may be caused to the NRL clubs resulting from (potential) player unavailability, and the possible financial risk that NRL clubs may have to assume because of NRL player contract security.”

The letter went on to state that key stakeholders in Australia wanted a copy of the full medical insurance policy, a copy of the full policy terms covering NRL clubs and players for loss incurred because of injury to a player, proposed options for Clubs and players where the insurance does not cover the length of a player’s contract and details of the remuneration for players.

The respective countries have been asked to front up to the 16 NRL club chief executives at a meeting on the Gold Coast on Tuesday. The NZRL said players who play in Denver will receive the same benefits which State of Origin and previous ANZAC Test policies.

They will also receive extra insurance required for playing in the US. Wests Tigers co-captain Elijah Taylor said he wants to play in the match.

“Any opportunity I get I’ll grab with both hands and I’m 100 per cent committed to every Kiwi game wherever it’s played,” Taylor said. “I understand the NRL clubs have concerns about playing in Denver, so it’s great to see the player insurance has been sorted for the Test.”

Players such as St George Illawarra duo Gareth Widdop and James Graham are due to play 48 hours after returning to Australia.

The co-signed letter described the short turnaround as “inadequate” based on medical advice.

“The circumstances under which the test has been scheduled and organised is deeply flawed,” the letter read. “It is unsatisfactory for a match to be scheduled at the agreement of the two nations without consideration for the adverse impact it will have on the players, NRL clubs and the NRL competition.”
 
There would be plenty of clubs more affected than Manly, ie. Souffs would lose the Burgess Brothers.
 
NRL make money out of SOO, whereas this contest is by a private promoter

I don't make an issue of that HM. ... neither the NZ or Pommie RL's would have the expertise to put the game on ... I would say that if the NRL were to play a game in the US they would also engage a local promoter ..... there must be an earn in it for them though ....
 
I don't make an issue of that HM. ... neither the NZ or Pommie RL's would have the expertise to put the game on ... I would say that if the NRL were to play a game in the US they would also engage a local promoter ..... there must be an earn in it for them though ....
This falls under the International Rugby League umbrella and that's why the Clubs are worried about insurance for possible long term injury to a player.

The RLPA CBA insurance deal, will not cover a player outside of an NRL competition.
 
They have an international promo game organized for non origin players. Tickets already sold. Go for it.

If nfl players can play there without expiring then so can nrl players. Give us a break.
 
A stern letter. lol

In the recent winter olympics the head of the NHL ('ice' hockey) league banned all the NHL players from taking part in the olympics for the first time in years.

Much outcry was heard (esp from Canada and america one of which usually wins gold) but the nhl stood firm, said insurance couldn't be arranged and they were not taking the risk with injury that would lessen their own product.

So... Germany got dudded by the 'olympic athletes from russia' who won gold and Canada won bronze.

So...the nrl (if they want to control such things) haven't quite got it set up right.

Soccer clubs in Europe never used to release Aussie players for international friendlies, and the nba weren't above banning players from playing in the olympics either.


Somewhere in there, I lost my point.
 
They have an international promo game organized for non origin players. Tickets already sold. Go for it.

If nfl players can play there without expiring then so can nrl players. Give us a break.
The issue is the lack of NRL oversight.😎

An ACL would rule a player out for 12 months, his Club would have to pay his contract but would not be able to claim back the medical insurance as this event is not an NRL game.

I'm just surprised that player contracts do not stipulate that they need clearance from the governing body to play in another competition :wondering:
 
This falls under the International Rugby League umbrella and that's why the Clubs are worried about insurance for possible long term injury to a player.

The RLPA CBA insurance deal, will not cover a player outside of an NRL competition.
Nrl needs to grow up. I mean so they can play origin and have an injury but not int footy. This is big opportunity for the code Denver broncos are promoting it.
The along with Wolfpack and rumoured New York and Boston joining rfl.
The fact is nrl needs to get there head out of there arse, interesting Gallen could not get his head around Pacific Islanders picking there nation over nsw. There going to be a big shift in next 10 years in rep footy.
The injury thing always going to be there no diff.
 
Nrl needs to grow up. I mean so they can play origin and have an injury but not int footy. This is big opportunity for the code Denver broncos are promoting it.
The along with Wolfpack and rumoured New York and Boston joining rfl.
The fact is nrl needs to get there head out of there arse, interesting Gallen could not get his head around Pacific Islanders picking there nation over nsw. There going to be a big shift in next 10 years in rep footy.
The injury thing always going to be there no diff.
You are missing the point

The point is that these players will not have full cover and not that they may get injured :wait:

This is why the RLPA are worried. Especially for players whose contract expires in 2018.😎
 
You are missing the point

The point is that these players will not have full cover and not that they may get injured :wait:

This is why the RLPA are worried. Especially for players whose contract expires in 2018.😎
Well given it’s a fully backed international by rlif. Todd and his puppets are doing everything here to get thus cancelled.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

  • Jethro
    Star Trekkin' across the universe

Members online

Latest posts

2020 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Bulldogs 10 9 0 1 110 20
2 Warriors 10 8 0 2 5 18
3 Storm 9 6 0 3 140 14
4 Raiders 10 7 0 3 48 14
5 Sharks 10 6 0 4 65 12
6 Sea Eagles 10 5 0 5 38 12
7 Cowboys 10 4 1 5 -32 11
8 Broncos 10 5 0 5 46 10
9 Tigers 10 5 0 5 -44 10
10 Roosters 10 4 0 6 -46 10
11 Rabbitohs 10 5 0 5 -62 10
12 Panthers 10 3 1 6 -2 9
13 Dolphins 11 4 0 7 6 8
14 Dragons 9 3 0 6 -15 8
15 Knights 10 3 0 7 -74 8
16 Titans 9 3 0 6 -84 8
17 Eels 10 3 0 7 -99 8
Back
Top Bottom