Will I Am
100% for certain " has the goat photos".
If Snake plays, toss of the coin, if Willie plays Tigers by plenty!!
I disagree with a lot of your points there.
1. 2 Hookers can still work, it worked for the Raiders, Broncos and Tigers last week.
Tooves wouldn't have picked last week's team.It's good to see we have much better depth this year and there are guys who can be promoted from NSW cup. Hopefully this is a wake-up call for the guys that they don't just automatically play in first grade each week.
And at least Barrett has made some changes this week. If it was Toovey then it's more than likely he would have stuck solid with last weeks team and we would have been going on about why no changes were made.
Moltzen has already injured himself in rd 1 - he must be made of eggshellsSo we pick starling .....wow.
Williame rubbish is moltzen not a 100 fg fullback.
Mateo is the only forward Manly has, that passes the ball, since Gifty leftI'm thinking that Barrett wants a forward who can pass the ball and connect with our edge players. None of the other fowards have much of a passing game. Our centres saw hardly any ball last week - especially Jamie.
Whilst our halves have to make sure we get the ball to the right players, it takes pressure off when we have a forward who can not only make metres, but can get the ball out wide as well.
Mateo is the only forward Manly has, that passes the ball, since Gifty left
Jake is coming along in his offloads, but Manly's second phase play has been woeful for years due to our lack of ball playing forwards. 😎I disagreed only because I have seen Jake Trbojevic do a fair bit of passing, and he's not bad. That actually might be one of the reasons that Barrett has moved him to lock this week. The guy is more than just a tackling machine and battering ram.
Knowing this gronk Barrett he will probably pick his fellow gronk brown over bruherLussick back where he belongs, hope he isn't chewing up too much of our cap.
Leary can feel hard done by, can't wait till Buher is back to push lemon brown out.
Hopefully Stewart is back, Tom t was quoted as saying he would be back this week
Jake is coming along in his offloads, but Manly's second phase play has been woeful for years due to our lack of ball playing forwards. 😎
Moltzen has already injured himself in rd 1 - he must be made of eggshells
When Barrett was first appointed as coach I was excited and optimistic. I suspect if my posts were trawled you would find me suggesting he would prove to be a great coach. I retract all of those statements and now express my panic that we have a dud rookie on our hands who is fumbling around in the dark like a virgin on their first big night in the sack.
I agree 100%. I just can't get my head around carrying an extra hooker, when hooker is generally accepted as a 40 minute player. Barrett's strategy is effectively reducing us to 7 interchanges which is a killer at this level.Personally, I just can't get rid of the feeling that TB kinda looked after the recruits from his previous clubs (St Merge, Sharks and Riff) by selecting them last week and without trying to look like he knows he got it wrong, he's tweaked it a bit here and there this week.
I don't think he's got it quite right yet. The wrong guys (Leary and Lussick) have been dropped when it should have been Green and Vave.
The only way I can explain Wiliame is that Snake was expected to be ok last week and Barrett went with him at the last moment because he has some experience, though none of it has been good so far.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |