The thing that really surprises me about LH is that he just has so much drive in his legs but it looks like there's almost nothing to him. Good genes I guess.
Agree. He would be lucky to be 80kgs.
The thing that really surprises me about LH is that he just has so much drive in his legs but it looks like there's almost nothing to him. Good genes I guess.
I think it is the issue on here… because if we let #6 go then every second person on here will be giving it to the recruitment team and Seibold for letting #6 go!I'm sure the club would like to keep all of them, that's not the issue.
Beyond this year I don't think Player #6 (whoever that is) would want to stick around to play out of position, on the bench, or only be playing if/when one of the other 5 get injured... especially when on current form they'd very likely get an offer for a starting backline spot at another club.
Agreed. It’s tantalising to think what some mature kg on his frame could lead toThe thing that really surprises me about LH is that he just has so much drive in his legs but it looks like there's almost nothing to him. Good genes I guess.
Kid is certainly no liability... his defence is solid and he has afterburners... I just think he stifles the attack a little as he has rarely broken tackles this year and has not been great at getting on the outside of his man and drawing the winger in... having said that he does have a good fast offload on those sweeping moves...B T W , think that it would be a major miscalculation understating Koula 's general value to the side [ and obviously when he is ideally injury free [
Has shown time and time again how his above average speed and general attacking and running ability and usual robust defence can definitely help big time to get the side to another level .
Hasn "t received the best of opportunities this season and then his injury issues but fortunately on the books for quite some time yet and sure that he can be a key backline asset during it .
I guess they hedge their bets and see where they goI'm sure the club would like to keep all of them, that's not the issue.
Beyond this year I don't think Player #6 (whoever that is) would want to stick around to play out of position, on the bench, or only be playing if/when one of the other 5 get injured... especially when on current form they'd very likely get an offer for a starting backline spot at another club.
It’s not about letting them go, it’s holding onto them. Clubs rarely keep the same depth players for long, as it changes year to year as players go looking for more regular footy and opportunities.We don't need to let any backs go we need the depth. We have utilized Burbo as both second rower and as a centre when needed and the same can be done with Talua. Talua does look like he has potential as a second rower. As to learning his trade I don't adhere to that logic. He is an established first grade footballer and he doesn't need to go back to Reggies to learn how to play a new position these guys are professionals training every day.
I like the way he has his plan already worked out when taking the high ball at the back. If there is no opportunity to do a kick return run, he drops immediately to the ground after securing the ball to ensure he isn't driven back or ends up copping a shotThe thing that really surprises me about LH is that he just has so much drive in his legs but it looks like there's almost nothing to him. Good genes I guess.
I think he is one of the most complete footballers I have seen at this stage of his career. It’s like he has an ‘old head on young shoulders’.I like the way he has his plan already worked out when taking the high ball at the back. If there is no opportunity to do a kick return run, he drops immediately to the ground after securing the ball to ensure he isn't driven back or ends up copping a shot
Sort of understand now why they took him to Vegas, at the time I thought What???I think he is one of the most complete footballers I have seen at this stage of his career. It’s like he has an ‘old head on young shoulders’.
Depends on the swelling, though 3-4 weeks post surgery.How long is a player out with a fractured eye socket?
He won’t be back for at least a month , bad luck for the kid he’s been going great guns.Depends on the swelling, though 3-4 weeks post surgery.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |