I actually think it is the other way around - JT has had to work hard on his game and Johns is the natural talent (although worked hard as well of course). Both are great players, but Johns had it all and held greater influence over the big games.Totally different players, but it's Thurston for mine. Johns was a smart thinking player, who worked very hard at his game, where i think Thurston is just a natural talent.
Totally different players, but it's Thurston for mine. Johns was a smart thinking player, who worked very hard at his game, where i think Thurston is just a natural talent.
If Joey's not a natural talent then nothing ever will be...I respect your opinion, but that vision and the innovation was the work of genius rather than a hard worker; I mean he was on E for most of his career.Totally different players, but it's Thurston for mine. Johns was a smart thinking player, who worked very hard at his game, where i think Thurston is just a natural talent.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |