I don't know. But I'm interested to see if someone's got the pigheadedness to correct you.Is headingness a real word??? Whatever!
'Bringing the game into disrepute' would cover the NRL legally.So the NRL can strip you of points now for employing someone they don't like?
They (the NRL) really wouldn't want this to go to court if he only has to be registered with the NSWRL and they also had him attend one of their coaching clinics. That's a legal lay up for Manly.
I can't stand Hoppa but I really can't see how an SG Ball coach, by his mere presence, brings the game into disrepute. You've got a convicted drug dealer playing for Parra along with enough players with domestic violence offences on their record to wash out a lot of his garbage.'Bringing the game into disrepute' would cover the NRL legally.
Plus we are not privy to what Hoppa had been up to since his coaching clinic last year. Hoppa's lawyer is in it for the fee and not for his benefit either.
The 'open source' events would allow the NRL's legal guy to request a copy.
The further he and ZtH are away from Manly, the more professional our Franchise looks
And, based on what we are told, neither are the NRL privy to this. So how can they possibly assess it?'Bringing the game into disrepute' would cover the NRL legally.
Plus we are not privy to what Hoppa had been up to since his coaching clinic last year.
Convictions are not required for an Organization to dismiss you.And, based on what we are told, neither are the NRL privy to this. So how can they possibly assess it?
There is a reason we have courts and don't just take police "opinions" as law.
On that logic, some police officer should approach the Pope telling him Pell is not suitable for a church role because he is being investigated re pedophilia allegations? You'd expect the conviction to come first wouldn't you? Natural justice? On the other hand the Pope, and Penn, can form their own unforced opinions, and act appropriately.
Manly is the employing organisation, not the NRL. I'm no lawyer, but I would've thought in the circumstances the NRL would need something new, tangible, and provable in court to sustain a disrepute charge in court. On what we're told, they don't have this.Convictions are not required for an Organization to dismiss you.
Something serious is going on for Manly to be in talks with the NRL, and for lawyers to be talking to the media.
Fans will be the last to be informed, even though this matter can drag on and waste another season for us
The 'distepute' charge is a great intangible that can not be attacked in a court of law. NRL can claim it and Manly can waste their money on lawyers till their coffers dry up.
NRL is an 'invitation to participate' organization. So they have nothing to lose if they do not invite Manly back - plenty of others waiting for a space to open up.🙄
I do not get the point of challenging the Governing body
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |